Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Unedited English audio of oral arguments at the Supreme Court of Canada. Created as a public service to promote public access and awareness of the workings of Canada’s highest court. Not affiliated with or endorsed by the Court. Original archived webcasts can be found on the Court’s website at scc-csc.ca. Feedback welcome: podcast at scchearings dot ca.
…
continue reading
The latest news and analysis about key cases and critical arguments before the Supreme Court. (Updated periodically) PBS News is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders
…
continue reading
A chronological podcast of oral arguments with improved files and meta data. Hosted by Free Law Project through the CourtListener.com initiative. Not an official podcast.
…
continue reading
Audio from oral arguments in the Supreme Court of the United States (beg. Oct. 2010)
…
continue reading
In depth explanations of Supreme Court Cases New Jersey v T.L.O, Mapp v Ohio, and Miranda v Arizona.
…
continue reading
Supreme Court Season episodes will include all arguments that occur from October 01st to April/May.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
A podcast feed for the audio of Supreme Court oral arguments and decision announcements. Short case descriptions are reproduced from Oyez.org under a CC BY-NC 4.0 license. This feed is not approved, managed, or affiliated with Oyez.org. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
We will dive into the astounding stories of the Supreme Court.
…
continue reading
Opinion announcements from the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
The Queens Supreme Court podcast is the hilarious spinoff of the hit online series “The Queens Supreme Court” with Ts Madison. The premise of the weekly satirical show is to discuss pop culture and all the hot social media trends, topics and gossip THEN try them as cases, render judgements and sentence the crimes accordingly to determine the ultimate fate of each celebrity!
…
continue reading
The Supreme Court decision syllabus, read without personal commentary. See: Wheaton and Donaldson v. Peters and Grigg, 33 U.S. 591 (1834) and United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U.S. 321, 337. Photo by: Davi Kelly. Founded by RJ Dieken. Now hosted by Jake Leahy. Frequent guest host Jeff Barnum. *Note this podcast is for informational and educational purposes only.
…
continue reading
Podcast by Hemant Mehta
…
continue reading
Brett and Nazim are two attorneys who hate being attorneys. In lieu of practicing law, they have instead developed a podcast to help make the Supreme Court more accessible to the average person. Each week, Brett and Nazim will discuss current Supreme Court cases and how they affect your daily life, while also ruminating on how their dreams of fame and fortune resulted in jokes about Star Wars and wondering how Ruth Bader Ginsburg thinks about Facebook. This Podcast is for entertainment purpo ...
…
continue reading
Any listeners out there...really want entertaining basketball content? Don't want to worry about the hosts - all on the show trying to force "controversial" hot takes, all in your earbuds, yelling back and forth to win an argument? Come to The Supreme Court: A Basketball Podcast! Check back with the SC trio; Robaire, Chris, and Henri, Wednesdays as we discuss the latest NBA headlines, news, and transactions.
…
continue reading
Throughout the years the Supreme Court has evolved much like the rest of the federal government. This would not be without landmark rulings, which will be the main focus of this podcast. Landmark rulings lay the groundwork for laws to be overturned or upheld and allow for the United States to work toward major goals. Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/aaron-larson2/support
…
continue reading
This study, A Christian Response to the Supreme Court Decision, exposes the foreboding Danger that this ruling will bring upon our nation if things don’t turn around very quickly. You will also be thoroughly equipped to give a loving Biblical apologetic response to 15 different accusations made against Christians regarding this issue.
…
continue reading
1
His Majesty the King v. Stuart Michael George Sabiston (40937)
58:55
58:55
Putar nanti
Putar nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai
58:55
During a search incident to arrest, a man told police that he had a firearm in his backpack. The officers subsequently seized a loaded prohibited firearm. The Crown ultimately stayed the charges from the initial arrest and proceeded to trial on firearms offences only. In a voir dire, the trial judge concluded that the police had breached the man’s …
…
continue reading
1
How an Oklahoma death penalty case reached the Supreme Court
3:53
3:53
Putar nanti
Putar nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai
3:53
The Supreme Court heard arguments in a death row case from Oklahoma. Justices looked at whether the due process rights of death row inmate Richard Glossip were violated when the state suppressed information about its star witness who committed the murder. A court of criminal appeals has denied Glossip's appeal for a retrial. Oklahoma communities co…
…
continue reading
A capital case in which the Court will decide whether to allow Oklahoma to execute Petitioner Richard Glossip after numerous instances of prosecutorial misconduct and other errors, where even the state no longer defends the capital sentence.
…
continue reading
1
Mohamed Adam Bharwani v. His Majesty the King (40781)
2:48:47
2:48:47
Putar nanti
Putar nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai
2:48:47
After several years of deteriorating mental health, the appellant moved into a basement apartment with other tenants. Five days later, the appellant attacked one of the other tenants by striking her with a fireplace poker and then strangling her to death. The appellant called 9-1-1 saying that he wanted to turn himself in because he had just “kille…
…
continue reading
1
John Howard Society of Saskatchewan v. Government of Saskatchewan (Attorney General for Saskatchewan) (Day 2/2) (40608)
2:00:07
2:00:07
Putar nanti
Putar nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai
2:00:07
When an inmate is charged with a disciplinary offence in a Saskatchewan provincial correctional centre or remand centre, s. 68 of The Correctional Services Regulations requires the institutional authorities to determine, on a balance of probabilities, that the inmate committed that offence in order to find them responsible. Some of the penalties im…
…
continue reading
Glossip v. OklahomaOleh Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
1
Supreme Court appears open to upholding regulations on ghost guns
6:32
6:32
Putar nanti
Putar nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai
6:32
The Supreme Court kicked off a new term of arguments with a major case focused on federal regulations of ghost guns. The justices weighed whether the government can regulate the firearms assembled at home with a kit with the same standard as other firearms made by licensed manufacturers. Geoff Bennett discussed more with News Hour Supreme Court ana…
…
continue reading
1
John Howard Society of Saskatchewan v. Government of Saskatchewan (Attorney General for Saskatchewan) (40608)
2:03:09
2:03:09
Putar nanti
Putar nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai
2:03:09
When an inmate is charged with a disciplinary offence in a Saskatchewan provincial correctional centre or remand centre, s. 68 of The Correctional Services Regulations requires the institutional authorities to determine, on a balance of probabilities, that the inmate committed that offence in order to find them responsible. Some of the penalties im…
…
continue reading
A case in which the Court will decide whether a party who obtains a preliminary injunction is a “prevailing party” for purposes of being entitled to attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988.
…
continue reading
A case in which the Court will decide whether the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives has the authority to regulate so-called “ghost guns”—that is, firearms without serial numbers that can be assembled from parts.
…
continue reading
Lackey v. StinnieOleh Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
1
Garland, Att'y Gen. v. VanDerStok
1:05:22
1:05:22
Putar nanti
Putar nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai
1:05:22
Garland, Att'y Gen. v. VanDerStokOleh Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
A case in which the Court will decide whether exhaustion of state administrative remedies is required to bring claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in state court.
…
continue reading
1
Royal Canin U.S.A. v. Wullschleger
1:05:22
1:05:22
Putar nanti
Putar nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai
1:05:22
A case in which the Court will decide whether a plaintiff whose state-court lawsuit has been removed by the defendants to federal court can seek to have the case sent back to state court by amending the complaint to omit all references to federal law.
…
continue reading
Williams v. WashingtonOleh Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
1
Royal Canin U.S.A., Inc. v. Wullschleger
56:08
56:08
Putar nanti
Putar nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai
56:08
Royal Canin U.S.A., Inc. v. WullschlegerOleh Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
1
Shea Flemmings, et al. v. His Majesty the King (41002)
32:38
32:38
Putar nanti
Putar nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai
32:38
(PUBLICATION BAN IN CASE) Mr. Agpoon was charged in December 2018 with offences relating to human trafficking in minors, possession of fentanyl, and a firearms offence. Mr. Flemmings was added to the Indictment in December 2019 on counts related to human trafficking and possession of fentanyl. The case came before the Ontario Court of Justice befor…
…
continue reading
1
Ketanji Brown Jackson reflects on her groundbreaking path to Supreme Court in new memoir
12:49
12:49
Putar nanti
Putar nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai
12:49
Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson is out with a new memoir chronicling her family's rise from segregation to her confirmation as the first Black woman on the nation's highest court, all in a single generation. Geoff Bennett sat down with Justice Jackson in New York to discuss "Lovely One." PBS News is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/ne…
…
continue reading
1
'Focus on ethics': Sen. Durbin discusses efforts to reform the Supreme Court
7:01
7:01
Putar nanti
Putar nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai
7:01
For more on the 2024 Democratic National Convention, the Harris-Walz ticket and efforts to implement ethics reforms for the U.S. Supreme Court, Geoff Bennett speaks with Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., on the convention floor in Chicago. PBS News is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders…
…
continue reading
1
Getting a concealed gun permit in NYC remains a challenge despite Supreme Court ruling
7:00
7:00
Putar nanti
Putar nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai
7:00
In 2022, the Supreme Court struck down a century-old law in New York restricting who could carry a concealed gun. The landmark ruling was seen by Second Amendment supporters as a huge victory and by gun control advocates as opening the door to violent chaos. Special correspondent Christopher Booker reports on what has and hasn't changed since then.…
…
continue reading
1
Biden proposes term limits and ethics code for Supreme Court justices
4:42
4:42
Putar nanti
Putar nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai
4:42
President Biden unveiled three proposed reforms in response to legal, ethical and political controversies around the Supreme Court. The plan includes an enforceable code of ethics for justices, term limits for the Supreme Court and a constitutional amendment limiting the recent decision on presidential immunity. White House Correspondent Laura Barr…
…
continue reading
This week's episode discusses Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, in which the Supreme Court overruled the Chevron doctrine, but not before discussing the potential success of lawsuits challenging the change in the Democratic candidate for President, and later discussing the many mysteries of the open ocean. It's an action-packed episode, folks. …
…
continue reading
1
Reviewing consequential and controversial decisions from the Supreme Court
9:48
9:48
Putar nanti
Putar nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai
9:48
The justices of the Supreme Court considered more than 60 cases this term before rendering their final decisions this week. Their rulings on abortion access, presidential immunity and the limits of executive branch agencies could have long-lasting impacts. They also showcased sharp divides among the justices. Amna Nawaz sat down with two Supreme Co…
…
continue reading
1
Historian discusses Supreme Court's immunity decision and shift in presidential powers
6:07
6:07
Putar nanti
Putar nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai
6:07
The Supreme Court's landmark decision on former President Trump's immunity from some legal prosecution has the potential to transform the powers of the presidency. Jeffrey Brown and Heather Cox Richardson of Boston College discussed how the ruling fits with history. PBS News is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders…
…
continue reading
This week's episode covers Trump v. U.S., which deals with the Court's new test for Presidential Immunity, how that test applies to former President Donald Trump, and whether Brett can talk Nazim off a ledge over the whole thing. Law starts from the beginning.
…
continue reading
1
Trump v. United States (Presidential Immunity)
24:11
24:11
Putar nanti
Putar nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai
24:11
Trump v. United States A federal grand jury indicted former President Donald J. Trump on four counts for conduct that occurred during his Presidency following the November 2020 election. The indictment alleged that after losing that election, Trump conspired to overturn it by spreading knowingly false claims of election fraud to obstruct the collec…
…
continue reading
1
City of Grants Pass v. Johnson (Public Camping Laws)
12:38
12:38
Putar nanti
Putar nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai
12:38
City of Grants Pass v. Johnson Grants Pass, Oregon, is home to roughly 38,000 people, about 600 of whom are estimated to experience homelessness on a given day. Like many local governments across the Nation, Grants Pass has publiccamping laws that restrict encampments on public property. The Grants Pass Municipal Code prohibits activities such as c…
…
continue reading
1
Fischer v. United States (Obstruction of Official Proceeding)
8:31
8:31
Putar nanti
Putar nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai
8:31
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 imposes criminal liability on anyone who corruptly “alters, destroys, mutilates, or conceals a record, document, or other object, or attempts to do so, with the intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding.” 18 U. S. C. §1512(c)(1). The next subsection extends that prohibit…
…
continue reading
1
How the Supreme Court immunity ruling reshapes presidential power
8:09
8:09
Putar nanti
Putar nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai
8:09
In one of the most anticipated rulings of the year, the Supreme Court declared that former President Trump is immune from criminal prosecution for any so-called "official act" taken as president, but not "unofficial ones'' taken as a candidate. Amna Nawaz discussed how the ruling reshapes presidential power with News Hour Supreme Court analyst Marc…
…
continue reading
1
Breaking down Supreme Court decisions on Jan. 6 cases, homeless camps and agency power
6:18
6:18
Putar nanti
Putar nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai
6:18
With just one day left in its term, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a trio of major decisions Friday. The justices upheld a law making it a crime for unhoused people to camp in public areas like parks, sidewalks and plazas, narrowed the scope of a law being used to prosecute Jan. 6 rioters and weakened the rule-making powers of regulatory agencies. J…
…
continue reading
1
The far-reaching implications of the Supreme Court's decision curbing regulatory power
6:33
6:33
Putar nanti
Putar nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai
6:33
The Supreme Court has swept aside long standing legal precedent in its ruling overturning the Chevron doctrine, majorly curtailing the power of federal agencies to interpret the laws they regulate. The decision is expected to have far-reaching implications on everything from the environment to healthcare. Geoff Bennett took a closer look with Andre…
…
continue reading
1
Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo (Administrative Law / Chevron Deference)
20:58
20:58
Putar nanti
Putar nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai
20:58
Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo This is a consolidated opinion of two cases that were argued this term. Both of them bring into question rules promulgated by the National Marine Fisheries Service under the Magnuson-Stevens Act -- which applies the Adminsitrative Procedures Act. The only question on appeal is whether Chevron is still good law. …
…
continue reading
In this very brief Per Curiam decision, RJ Dieken also reads the concurring opinions authored Justice Kagan and Justice Barrett.Oleh Jake Leahy
…
continue reading
1
Harrington v. Purdue Pharma (Bankruptcy)
10:01
10:01
Putar nanti
Putar nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai
10:01
Harrington v. Purdue Pharma Purdue Pharma pleaded guilty in 2007 to a federal felony based on its role in misbranding Oxycontin -- which was far more addictive than the company had made it out to be. Purdue faced seemingly endless lawsuits in the following years based on how addictive the opioid Oxycontin was. For over a decade that followed, the S…
…
continue reading
Ohio v. EPA The Clean Air Act requires both the States and federal government to help develop environmental regulations. When the EPA creates certain standards regarding air quality, states have to develop their own "State Implementation Plan," which requires States to both set out how to go about applying the federal regulations, and it also requi…
…
continue reading
1
SEC v. Jarkesy (Jury Trial / Securities)
13:45
13:45
Putar nanti
Putar nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai
13:45
SEC v. Jarkesy In the aftermath of the Wall Street Crash of 1929, Congress passed a suite of laws designed to combat securities fraud and increase market transparency. Three such statutes are relevant: The Securities Act of 1933, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. These Acts respectively govern the registr…
…
continue reading
1
Conservative Supreme Court majority takes aim at 'administrative state' in latest rulings
6:56
6:56
Putar nanti
Putar nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai
6:56
The U.S. Supreme Court handed down several high-profile decisions Thursday morning. One case blocked a controversial bankruptcy deal involving the opioid crisis, another reinstated access to abortions for those facing medical emergencies in Idaho and a third blocked an EPA rule regulating air pollution from taking effect. John Yang reports on the s…
…
continue reading