The Niall Boylan Podcast (They Told Me To Shut Up) podcast

The Niall Boylan Podcast (They Told Me To Shut Up)

Player FM - Internet Radio Done Right

36 subscribers

Menambahkan four tahun yang lalu

Konten disediakan oleh Niall Boylan. Semua konten podcast termasuk episode, grafik, dan deskripsi podcast diunggah dan disediakan langsung oleh Niall Boylan atau mitra platform podcast mereka. Jika Anda yakin seseorang menggunakan karya berhak cipta Anda tanpa izin, Anda dapat mengikuti proses yang diuraikan di sini https://id.player.fm/legal.

The So What from BCG

1
Re-Recruiting and Other New HR Strategies You Can’t Ignore 18:09

11 hari yang lalu18:09

Putar Nanti

Daftar

Suka

Menyukai

18:09

HR is no longer just about managing people—it’s about shaping the future of work. Jens Baier, BCG’s HR transformation expert, discusses how AI and shifting employee expectations are forcing companies to rethink talent strategies. From re-recruiting to upskilling employees, HR must adapt to a rapidly changing landscape. Learn More: Jens Baier: https://on.bcg.com/41ca7Gv BCG on People Strategy: https://on.bcg.com/3QtAjro Decoding Global Talent: https://on.bcg.com/4gUC4IT…

The Niall Boylan Podcast (They Told Me To Shut Up)

Beranda serial•Feed

Niall Boylan is online, and nobody can hold him back. Subscribe to The Niall Boylan Show and access premium content by visiting https://niallboylan.com

546 episode

#Society #Niall Boylan #Ireland #Thought Provoking

The Niall Boylan Podcast (They Told Me To Shut Up)

36 subscribers

updated 3 hari yang lalu

Beranda serial•Feed

Niall Boylan is online, and nobody can hold him back. Subscribe to The Niall Boylan Show and access premium content by visiting https://niallboylan.com

546 episode

#Society #Niall Boylan #Ireland #Thought Provoking

Semua episode

The Niall Boylan Podcast (They Told Me To Shut Up)

1
#371 Parent or Protector? When a Father Strikes Back at a Bully 1:28:09

3 hari yang lalu1:28:09

1:28:09

In this emotionally charged episode, Niall explores a listener’s intense dilemma: Did he go too far when he hit his son’s bully? A heartbroken parent emailed in, sharing how their 14-year-old son—who has special needs—suffered relentless bullying for six months. Despite repeated complaints to the school and the bully’s parents, nothing changed. The situation took a dramatic turn when the bully publicly taunted the family, pushing the father past his breaking point. In a moment of rage, he confronted the bully and hit him. Now, the parents are divided—was it justified, or did he cross the line? Some callers think the father did the right thing. After months of inaction from the school and the bully’s parents, what else was he supposed to do? Sometimes, a bully only understands force. Maybe now the kid will think twice before tormenting another child. While other callers feel no matter how awful the bully was, hitting a child was the wrong move. Now the father is the one in trouble, and it sets a bad example for his son. Confronting the bully is one thing, but resorting to violence could lead to legal trouble, school consequences, or even make things worse for his son. As emotions run high, Niall reflects on whether the father’s reaction was an act of protection or a step too far.…

The Niall Boylan Podcast (They Told Me To Shut Up)

1
#370 Would You Cross the Line to Keep Your Family Afloat? 1:09:48

4 hari yang lalu1:09:48

1:09:48

In this episode, Niall tackles a tough moral dilemma: Would you steal to provide for your family? A listener working a low-paying warehouse job emailed in, revealing that he's tempted to take part in package theft to make ends meet. Facing rising costs and financial strain, he wonders if breaking the law is justifiable when survival is on the line. With no guests, Niall opens the lines to hear what listeners think—is theft ever acceptable if it means keeping your family fed? Some callers think if you're struggling to survive, you do what you have to do. Morality becomes a luxury when your kids are hungry. Big companies rake in billions while underpaying workers, so if someone takes a little to make ends meet, it’s not exactly a crime against humanity. It’s not stealing—it’s leveling the playing field. While other callers feel theft is theft, no matter the situation. Businesses lose money, prices go up, and honest people suffer the consequences. There are other ways to get help without resorting to crime. Getting caught could cost him his job and land him with a criminal record, putting his family in an even worse position. No matter how desperate things get, stealing is never the answer. As the debate rages on, Niall reflects on the arguments from both sides. While desperation can push people to extremes, is stealing ever truly justifiable? He leaves listeners with the question: Would you cross the line to keep your family afloat, or is there always another way?…

The Niall Boylan Podcast (They Told Me To Shut Up)

1
#369 Battle of the Sexes: Who Has It Easier Men or Women? 1:31:32

5 hari yang lalu1:31:32

1:31:32

In this episode, Niall tackles the age-old debate: Who has it easier—men or women? With gender equality constantly evolving, the conversation explores different aspects of life, from the workplace to relationships, mental health, and societal expectations. The episode begins with a discussion on recent research, including the BIGI scores, which assess gender disadvantages across 134 countries. Surprisingly, the findings suggest that men face more disadvantages in 91 countries, while women experience greater challenges in 43. But what does this really mean in the context of modern-day life? Niall examines workplace dynamics, challenging common narratives around the gender pay gap and career opportunities. Do men still hold the upper hand, or has the playing field shifted? The discussion then moves into relationships and domestic roles—are women still expected to take on the majority of household and childcare responsibilities, or has society adjusted to a more equal standard? With perspectives from all sides, this episode doesn’t shy away from the tough questions, including the societal pressures men face to be stoic providers and the safety concerns that many women experience in their daily lives. Some callers think women now have more advantages—workplace quotas, stronger social support systems, and automatic preference in family courts. They argue that when men struggle, nobody seems to care. Society expects men to be strong, unemotional, and independent, yet men face higher suicide rates and less focus on mental health. If we’re talking about who has it "easier," men are often left to fend for themselves without support. While other callers feel men still dominate in high-paying jobs and leadership positions, and they don’t experience the same level of societal scrutiny. Women are expected to juggle careers and family responsibilities while being judged no matter what choice they make. They also highlight issues of safety, harassment, and the double standards women face in both their personal and professional lives. The idea that men have it harder doesn’t hold up when women still face so many deeply ingrained disadvantages. As the debate comes to a close, Niall reflects on the passionate perspectives from both sides. While some argue that men face silent struggles that are often ignored, others point out the systemic inequalities that still hold women back. One thing is clear—this conversation is far from over.…

The Niall Boylan Podcast (They Told Me To Shut Up)

1
#368 Brotherly Betrayal: Should I Expose the Truth? 1:15:02

6 hari yang lalu1:15:02

1:15:02

In this episode, Niall tackles a heartbreaking dilemma sent in by a listener who has discovered that his brother’s wife is having an affair. Now, he’s torn—should he tell his brother the truth or stay silent to avoid tearing the family apart? The weight of this secret has left him struggling with guilt, fear, and uncertainty about the consequences of revealing the affair. As Niall explores the complexity of the situation, he asks: Does his brother have a right to know, or is it better to let sleeping dogs lie? Would revealing the truth help or only cause irreversible damage? Some callers think he should keep his mouth shut. Telling his brother could destroy the marriage and tear the family apart, all for something that might already be over. Unless the affair is still ongoing or a serious threat, interfering in someone else’s relationship is dangerous. They argue that relationships are complicated—maybe the brother already suspects, or maybe there’s more going on behind closed doors than the listener realizes. Getting involved could make things worse, not better. While other callers feel he absolutely needs to tell his brother. No one wants to be the last to know about their partner’s betrayal. If the truth comes out later and his brother finds out that family members knew and said nothing, the betrayal will be even deeper. They argue that honesty, no matter how painful, is always better than living in the dark. The brother deserves the chance to decide what to do with the truth rather than being kept in the dark. As the discussion comes to a close, Niall reflects on the emotional weight of this dilemma. Family loyalty, personal integrity, and the potential for devastation all play a role in this impossible decision. Whether the listener decides to speak up or stay silent, one thing is clear—there are no easy answers when it comes to betrayal and family.…

The Niall Boylan Podcast (They Told Me To Shut Up)

1
#367 From Love to Likes: What If Your Partner Profits from OnlyFans? 1:14:30

10 hari yang lalu1:14:30

1:14:30

In this episode, Niall delves into a sensitive and modern relationship dilemma: What would you do if your partner sold explicit pictures of themselves on OnlyFans? A listener emailed in with a real-life predicament. She’s engaged to a wonderful man, but recently noticed an unexplained increase in their finances. When she asked about it, her partner admitted he had been secretly making money on OnlyFans, selling explicit content. He claimed he didn’t tell her earlier because he feared how she would react. Now, she’s torn—on one hand, they’re benefiting financially, but on the other, she feels betrayed. To her, it feels like a form of infidelity, especially since many of his subscribers are men. Should she accept this as a harmless way to make money, or is this a dealbreaker? Some callers think it’s not a big deal. As long as it’s just pictures or videos and there’s no physical cheating, what’s the harm? People make money in all sorts of ways, and OnlyFans is just another platform to earn a living. The real issue isn’t the content—it’s that he kept it a secret. If he had been upfront from the start, maybe it wouldn’t be such a shock. If both partners are okay with it, then it shouldn’t be an issue. While other callers feel this is a complete betrayal. Selling intimate pictures to strangers crosses a serious boundary in a committed relationship. It’s not just about making money—it’s about exposing yourself to the world in a way that many would consider infidelity. The fact that he hid it from her makes it even worse. If he knew she wouldn’t approve, then why do it in the first place? Trust is broken, and for many, that’s unforgivable. As the discussion winds down, Niall reflects on the emotional weight of the situation. Trust, honesty, and boundaries are key in any relationship, and whether this is a dealbreaker or just a difficult conversation depends on the couple involved. For some, this is a harmless way to make extra income, while for others, it’s a betrayal that shatters trust. Is OnlyFans just another job, or does it cross a moral line? That’s a question only each couple can answer.…

The Niall Boylan Podcast (They Told Me To Shut Up)

1
#366 Ruff Justice: Is Leaving Dogs Out All Day Neglect? 39:02

11 hari yang lalu39:02

39:02

In this episode, Niall is asking: Is it neglectful to leave dogs outside all day and night, or is it just a different way of raising them? With growing awareness of animal welfare, the debate over whether dogs should be kept indoors or left outside has become a heated topic. Some believe it’s cruel and irresponsible to leave a dog outdoors for long periods, while others argue that certain breeds are well-suited for outdoor living and have thrived that way for generations. Some callers think leaving a dog outside all day and night is absolutely neglectful. They argue that dogs are social animals that need companionship and protection from extreme weather conditions. If someone isn’t willing to provide a warm, safe environment inside the home, they shouldn’t have a pet at all. One caller passionately said, "Dogs aren’t livestock! They need interaction and love, not to be left alone in the cold." While other callers feel not all dogs need to be indoors all the time. Certain breeds, like Huskies and working farm dogs, are naturally built for outdoor living and are more comfortable in colder temperatures. As long as they have proper shelter, food, and water, there’s nothing cruel about it. "People are overreacting. Years ago, dogs lived in kennels outside and no one had an issue. Now suddenly, it’s ‘abuse’ to not have them on the couch?" one caller argued. As the conversation comes to a close, Niall reflects on the deeply divided opinions on this issue. While some believe leaving a dog outside is unacceptable, others argue that it depends on the breed, environment, and level of care provided. The discussion raises important questions about changing attitudes toward pet ownership and how society defines responsible care.…

The Niall Boylan Podcast (They Told Me To Shut Up)

1
#365 Irish Need Not Apply? Croke Park’s Refugee Job Fair 1:26:31

12 hari yang lalu1:26:31

1:26:31

In this episode, Niall is asking: Was the UN and Indeed-funded job fair for refugees held at Croke Park a bold move to help those in need—or was it an act of discrimination against Irish citizens struggling for work? The event, which took place just yesterday, has ignited fierce online debate. Critics argue that the job fair shows preferential treatment for refugees, fueling accusations that while right-wing voices claim “refugees don’t work,” policies like these unfairly favor non-citizens over locals. Others counter that the fair represents a necessary commitment to helping highly skilled refugees integrate into society and contribute to the economy, benefiting everyone in Ireland. Some callers think the job fair was a great idea. They emphasize that refugees, many of whom are skilled and eager to work, need support to rebuild their lives. To these listeners, the event is not about discriminating against Irish people—it’s about offering opportunities where they are most needed, ultimately strengthening the community as a whole. Meanwhile, other callers believe the fair is unfair, arguing that in a country where many locals are unemployed, such initiatives send the wrong message. They contend that the focus should be on helping Irish citizens first, rather than giving special treatment to refugees. Niall concludes by reflecting on the complex balance between humanitarian aid and domestic employment concerns. He challenges listeners to consider whether extending support to refugees is an act of solidarity that benefits the whole nation, or if it inadvertently sidelines the needs of local job…

The Niall Boylan Podcast (They Told Me To Shut Up)

1
#364 Shamrocks and Statesmanship: Who Should Represent Ireland at the White House? 1:21:25

13 hari yang lalu1:21:25

1:21:25

In this episode, Niall is asking: Who should bring the traditional bowl of shamrocks to the White House this year? This annual ritual—a symbol of Irish heritage and goodwill—has long served as a tangible reminder of the enduring ties between Ireland and the United States. Traditionally, an esteemed Irish representative is chosen to present a bowl filled with freshly picked shamrocks, signifying not only the beauty of Irish culture but also a spirit of unity and statesmanship. Niall reflects on the significance of this gesture, questioning which candidate or public figure best embodies the authentic Irish spirit and would make a proud representative on this prestigious stage. Niall concludes the episode by challenging listeners to consider the qualities that truly define Irish identity in the modern world, and what it means to represent a nation on the global stage.…

The Niall Boylan Podcast (They Told Me To Shut Up)

1
#363 A Name, A Lie, A Marriage on the Brink 1:19:51

17 hari yang lalu1:19:51

1:19:51

In this episode, Niall addresses a challenging question at the intersection of hiring practices and redemption. Inspired by a compelling tweet that highlighted the struggle of an individual unable to secure a job due to a past petty conviction, Niall asks: Should a minor mistake from years ago forever block someone’s future? Some callers argue that everyone deserves a second chance. They contend that if a person has learned from their past errors and demonstrated growth, employers should focus on skills and potential rather than a single, long-ago mistake. They believe that holding a minor offense against someone only prevents them from contributing positively to society. Meanwhile, other callers maintain that employers must exercise due diligence. They argue that even a petty conviction can serve as a warning sign about an individual’s judgment, and that businesses have a responsibility to protect themselves by scrutinizing a candidate's background. For these listeners, a criminal record—even a minor one—can’t simply be overlooked without considering potential risks. Niall concludes by reflecting on the fine balance between offering second chances and ensuring accountability in the job market, leaving listeners to ponder whether our society should lean towards forgiveness and redemption or uphold stricter standards based on past mistakes.…

The Niall Boylan Podcast (They Told Me To Shut Up)

1
#362 One Offer Only: Should Refusing a Council House Mean Losing Your Place? 1:12:53

18 hari yang lalu1:12:53

1:12:53

In this episode, Niall takes on a topic at the heart of Ireland's housing crisis: should individuals be removed from the housing list if they decline an offer of a council house? The issue was sparked by a provocative post in the Facebook group "Mas On A Rant"—a post that some dismissed as a joke, yet it raises serious questions about entitlement and expectations in social housing. Some callers argue that if you're on the housing list and you turn down a council house, you should be removed. With a massive shortage of affordable homes, rejecting an offer—regardless of personal preferences—takes a vital resource away from someone in genuine need. They insist that accepting a council house is part of the agreement when you sign up, and high standards should not come at the expense of fairness and social responsibility. Other callers contend that the issue isn’t so black and white. They argue that there can be valid reasons for declining an offer—a location in a dangerous area, substandard facilities, or other concerns that impact family safety and well-being. Automatically removing someone from the housing list may punish those with legitimate grievances rather than addressing the systemic issues behind the housing shortage. Instead of strict penalties, they suggest the focus should be on improving the quality and variety of available homes. Niall concludes by reflecting on the complex balance between fairness and practical needs in social housing. He leaves listeners with a challenging question: Should the system enforce a strict “take it or leave it” policy, or should there be more flexibility to account for genuine concerns about housing quality?…

The Niall Boylan Podcast (They Told Me To Shut Up)

1
#361 Past Mistakes, Future Blocked: Should Ex-Convicts Get a Second Chance? 42:51

19 hari yang lalu42:51

42:51

In this episode, we dive into a challenging question at the intersection of hiring practices and redemption. Inspired by a compelling tweet highlighting how a past petty conviction can derail a person's chances of securing employment, Niall sparks a candid discussion about whether ex-convicts deserve a second chance. Some callers argued that everyone deserves a second chance. They believe that a minor conviction from years ago shouldn’t define someone's future. If an individual has learned from their mistake and moved on, employers should focus on their skills and potential rather than dwelling on a past error. After all, we've all made mistakes, and holding a minor offense over someone's head only keeps them from contributing positively to society. Other callers maintained that employers must consider risk and reputation when making hiring decisions. They argued that even a petty conviction can be a red flag regarding a person’s judgment. Businesses have a responsibility to protect themselves by scrutinizing a candidate’s background. For these callers, due diligence is essential, and any criminal record—even a minor one—could indicate potential issues that shouldn't be ignored. Niall concludes the discussion by reflecting on the delicate balance between offering second chances and ensuring safe, reliable hiring practices. He leaves listeners with the question: Should a past mistake forever block someone’s future, or is it time to embrace the possibility of redemption?…

The Niall Boylan Podcast (They Told Me To Shut Up)

1
#360 Breaking the Chains: Is Decriminalization the Answer to Drug Addiction? 1:00:52

20 hari yang lalu1:00:52

1:00:52

In this episode, Niall is asking whether decriminalizing drugs could finally break the chains of addiction and reduce the grip of criminal enterprises. Karl Deeter brings his well-researched, nuanced perspective to the table, advocating for a shift from punitive measures to a framework that emphasizes harm reduction, education, and responsible regulation. Drawing on the historical failure of alcohol prohibition as a cautionary tale, Karl argues that decriminalization could not only wrest control away from the black market but also foster a safer, more health-focused society. Some callers believe we should legalize—or at least decriminalize—all drugs. Citing successful examples like Portugal, they argue that the current approach only fuels the underground market and escalates violence. They assert that regulation could lead to safer use, reduce overdose risks, and allow law enforcement to focus on more serious crimes. To these listeners, transforming drug policy is a necessary step toward protecting public health. Other callers remain cautious. They worry that legalizing drugs might inadvertently normalize dangerous behaviors and increase overall usage, potentially burdening our healthcare and social systems. They advocate for maintaining strict drug laws paired with robust rehabilitation programs, emphasizing that a controlled, cautious approach is vital to prevent further social harm. Niall concludes by reflecting on the passionate and diverse viewpoints shared throughout the discussion. He leaves listeners pondering whether decriminalization could truly serve as the breakthrough we need to address drug addiction—or if it might open the door to unforeseen consequences.…

The Niall Boylan Podcast (They Told Me To Shut Up)

1
#359 Married & Hiding: The Secret Lives of Gay Men in Straight Marriages 1:25:17

24 hari yang lalu1:25:17

1:25:17

In this episode, Niall challenges us to confront two hard-hitting questions: Do secretly gay men in straight marriages deserve sympathy, and are most men hiding their true sexuality? The conversation is sparked by a series of explosive revelations, starting with Tucker Carlson’s upcoming interview with Larry Sinclair—a convicted con artist who has made sensational claims about a former U.S. President. Sinclair alleges drug-fueled encounters that have reignited controversy and debate, setting the stage for a deeper exploration of hidden lives and forbidden desires. Adding fuel to the fire, Niall shares a fascinating experiment conducted by a producer who created a Grindr account. Within 24 hours, the account was inundated with messages from married men discreetly seeking same-sex encounters—a stark reminder of the secret double lives many may be leading. The discussion intensifies further when Niall reads a deeply personal email from a listener who spent 30 years suppressing his true identity due to family and religious pressures. As the phone lines open, callers clash: many express outrage over the deception in marriage, while one lone voice defends these hidden identities as a byproduct of unbearable societal pressure. In the end, Niall leaves us with a challenging question: in a world where so much remains concealed, do these secret lives reveal a deep, systemic need for understanding, or are they simply a betrayal of trust? Niall concludes by reflecting on the painful costs of living a double life and urges listeners to consider the complexities of identity, societal expectations, and the personal toll of secrecy.…

The Niall Boylan Podcast (They Told Me To Shut Up)

1
#358 Innocent Uploads or Digital Footprints? The Risks of Posting Kids Online 35:59

24 hari yang lalu35:59

35:59

In this episode, Niall asks: Is it irresponsible to post pictures of your children on social media? With the digital age in full swing, sharing snapshots of our kids has become second nature—but at what cost? The discussion is sparked by a startling case from Austria, where an 18-year-old is suing her parents for posting over 500 images of her on Facebook without her consent. This real-world example serves as a catalyst for a deep dive into the ethical and legal implications of sharing intimate moments of children’s lives online. Niall and his callers explore a range of issues, from the rise of online predators and government surveillance to the paradox of modern connectivity versus the risk it poses to our children’s privacy. The conversation delves into whether parental responsibility should include safeguarding digital footprints, and how shifting social norms are challenging traditional ideas of privacy. Amid the lively debate, callers share diverse perspectives—from those who see these practices as harmless expressions of love and pride, to others who warn that oversharing can leave lasting digital marks that may one day come back to haunt our children. A regular caller even challenges the prevailing concerns, suggesting that some fears might be more about societal paranoia than actual danger. Listeners weigh in with passionate viewpoints. Some argue that the potential risks—from unwanted attention by online predators to future privacy breaches—make it imperative for parents to think twice before posting. Others counter that, with proper caution and limited sharing, the digital world can be navigated safely without sacrificing those cherished moments. Niall concludes by reflecting on the delicate balance between sharing the joys of parenthood and protecting our children’s future. In an era where every upload can leave a permanent digital footprint, he leaves us with a question: How do we honor the beauty of our children’s lives while ensuring their privacy isn’t compromised?…

The Niall Boylan Podcast (They Told Me To Shut Up)

1
#357 Men in Childcare: Breaking Barriers or Crossing Boundaries? 45:27

26 hari yang lalu45:27

45:27

In this episode, Niall tackles a thought-provoking question that challenges traditional gender roles: "Would you be comfortable with a man working in a creche?" As the discussion unfolds, listeners share a range of perspectives, revealing deep-seated beliefs about masculinity and caregiving. Pauline expresses unease about shifting gender norms, arguing that masculinity is being eroded in modern society. She wonders what has happened to traditional male roles and firmly states that she wouldn’t feel comfortable leaving her infant in the care of a male professional. On the other side of the debate, James embraces a gender-neutral approach to childcare, arguing that men should have just as much opportunity to work in creches as women. His willingness to trust a male caregiver reflects the evolving landscape of parenting and childcare. The conversation takes a dramatic turn when Steve, a frequent caller, sparks controversy by suggesting that all men have the potential to be threats. He points to crime statistics, arguing that men are statistically more likely to commit sexual offenses and that women are more often victims of violence. Based on this, he strongly opposes the idea of a man looking after his child. Throughout the heated discussion, Niall keeps the conversation balanced, allowing a space for open debate while challenging assumptions and stereotypes. As the episode progresses, deeper questions emerge about gender biases, trust, and societal expectations in caregiving. Tune in as Niall and his callers explore the evolving role of men in childcare and debate whether resistance to male caregivers is rooted in genuine concern or outdated prejudice.…

Selamat datang di Player FM!

Player FM memindai web untuk mencari podcast berkualitas tinggi untuk Anda nikmati saat ini. Ini adalah aplikasi podcast terbaik dan bekerja untuk Android, iPhone, dan web. Daftar untuk menyinkronkan langganan di seluruh perangkat.