Virtual Legality podcast

Player FM - Internet Radio Done Right

0-10 subscribers

Menambahkan one tahun yang lalu

Konten disediakan oleh Richard Hoeg. Semua konten podcast termasuk episode, grafik, dan deskripsi podcast diunggah dan disediakan langsung oleh Richard Hoeg atau mitra platform podcast mereka. Jika Anda yakin seseorang menggunakan karya berhak cipta Anda tanpa izin, Anda dapat mengikuti proses yang diuraikan di sini https://id.player.fm/legal.

How to Be a Better Human

1
How to make the most of a finite life (w/ Oliver Burkeman) 40:22

26 weeks yang lalu40:22

Putar Nanti

Daftar

Suka

Menyukai

40:22

There’s only so much you can do in a week – or, according to Oliver Burkeman, in the roughly 4,000 weeks the average human lives. Oliver is a journalist and author of the books Four Thousand Weeks: Time Management for Mortals, Meditations for Mortals, and the newsletter “The Imperfectionist.” Chris and Oliver discuss the paradox of why change can only occur once we accept that we might not be able to change. Oliver also shares how life’s mishaps can become our most treasured memories and why sharing your imperfections is an act of generosity. For the full text transcript, visit go.ted.com/BHTranscripts For the full text transcript, visit go.ted.com/BHTranscripts Want to help shape TED's shows going forward? Fill out our survey ! For a chance to give your own TED Talk, fill out the Idea Search Application: ted.com/ideasearch . Interested in learning more about upcoming TED events? Follow these links: TEDNext: ted.com/futureyou Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.…

Virtual Legality

Beranda serial•Feed

Virtual Legality is a continuing series discussing the law, video games, software, and everything digital, hosted by Richard Hoeg, of the Hoeg Law Business Law Firm (Hoeg Law).

790 episode

#Video Games #News Talk #Lifestyle #News

Virtual Legality

0-10 subscribers

updated 9 hari yang lalu

Beranda serial•Feed

Virtual Legality is a continuing series discussing the law, video games, software, and everything digital, hosted by Richard Hoeg, of the Hoeg Law Business Law Firm (Hoeg Law).

790 episode

#Video Games #News Talk #Lifestyle #News

Alle episoder

Virtual Legality

1
WE DO NOT ACCEPT | Stopping Payment Processors and the End of Freedom (VL) 1:21:05

9 hari yang lalu1:21:05

1:21:05

In this episode, lawyer Richard Hoeg explores the complexities of censorship on digital platforms, focusing on Steam's new rules influenced by payment processors. He discusses financial censorship, game removals, and pressure from credit card companies. The impact on digital marketplaces like itch.io and the influence of activist group Collective Shout on content policies are also examined. Hoeg addresses broader implications for free speech and democracy, antitrust limitations, and the potential role of payment processors as common carriers. The episode concludes with a discussion on consumer actions, platform responsibilities, and a call to action for viewers/listeners. LINKS STEAM https://www.engadget.com/gaming/steam-now-bans-games-that-violate-the-rules-and-standards-of-payment-processors-and-banks-164222173.html https://x.com/SteamDB/status/1945409792207421900 https://partner.steamgames.com/doc/gettingstarted/onboarding?language=english#5 https://www.pcgamer.com/software/platforms/valve-confirms-credit-card-companies-pressured-it-to-delist-certain-adult-games-from-steam/ https://www.pcguide.com/news/valve-responds-to-payment-processor-controversy-hopes-devs-have-another-game-to-put-on-steam/ ITCH.IO https://www.gamefile.news/p/itchio-steam-collective-shout-sex-games-consume-me https://itch.io/updates/update-on-nsfw-content PAYMENT PROCESSORS https://theretailexec.com/payment-processing/payment-processors/ https://civitai.com/articles/13632/policy-and-content-adjustments COLLECTIVE SHOUT https://www.pcgamer.com/gaming-industry/australian-anti-porn-group-claims-responsibility-for-steams-new-censorship-rules-in-victory-against-porn-sick-brain-rotted-pedo-gamer-fetishists-and-things-only-get-weirder-from-there/ https://www.collectiveshout.org/campaigns https://www.collectiveshout.org/about https://www.collectiveshout.org/faq https://www.collectiveshout.org/media-release-payment-gateways https://www.collectiveshout.org/open-letter-to-payment-processors EXISTENTIAL THREAT https://automaton-media.com/en/news/visa-japans-ceo-says-disabling-card-payment-for-legal-adult-content-is-necessary-to-protect-the-brand/ https://automaton-media.com/en/news/nier-creator-speaks-out-against-payment-processors-pressuring-japanese-adult-content-platforms/ https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/1 https://lawshun.com/article/what-is-a-common-carrier-under-federal-law (0:14) Introduction and special request to audience (1:13) Censorship, Steam's new rule, and payment processors (5:44) Financial censorship and its implications (8:08) Steam database changes and game removals (10:16) Legal analysis of Steam's content policy changes (15:26) Valve's confirmation of credit card company pressures (18:13) Valve's response to payment method concerns (21:32) Impact on itch.io and digital marketplace censorship (24:09) Case study: Consume Me game and de-indexed games statistics (26:03) Collective Shout's role in content crackdown (27:07) Collective Shout's previous campaigns and influence (28:20) Gamefile endorsement and payment processors' influence (30:21) itch.io's statement and consumer policy reactions (37:00) Payment processors' role and regulatory landscape (44:59) Analysis of Collective Shout's campaigns and impact (51:42) Corporate social responsibility in content policy (56:57) Using payment processors for policy enforcement (59:44) Influence of Collective Shout on platform content decisions (1:00:19) Uncertainty around involved payment processors (1:05:52) Payment processors' effect on free speech and democracy (1:08:22) Antitrust limitations and common carrier concepts (1:12:20) Discussion on payment processors as common carriers (1:14:00) Consumer actions and platform responsibilities (1:17:18) Addressing activist pressures and government regulation (1:19:18) Episode summary and call to action (1:20:27) Closing remarks and support options…

Virtual Legality

1
The Great EULA Switch Up | A Lawyer Reads (some of) Nintendo's Controversial New Terms 41:24

7 weeks yang lalu41:24

41:24

In this episode, lawyer Richard Hoeg explores Nintendo's recent user agreement changes, focusing on anti-piracy measures and new prohibitions. He provides a legal analysis of user rights, legal language, and implications for parental consent and breaches. The episode also touches on public perception, copyright issues, DMCA, and potential penalties. Richard examines patent law through the Impression vs. Lexmark case and compares ownership rights between the Nintendo Switch and other systems. He underscores the importance of understanding user agreements and the need for EULA awareness, concluding with final thoughts. LINKS NINTENDO TERMS https://www.gamefile.news/p/nintendo-emulation-hacking-brick-warning-terms-of-service https://accounts.nintendo.com/term/eula/US?lang=en-US https://web.archive.org/web/20250329190927/https://accounts.nintendo.com/term/eula/US?lang=en-US MEDIA RESPONSE https://www.ign.com/articles/nintendo-revises-user-agreement-and-if-you-break-it-nintendo-reserves-the-right-to-brick-your-switch https://www.laptopmag.com/gaming/nintendo/nintendo-eula-update-can-ban-or-brick-switch-2 https://hothardware.com/news/nintendo-eula-update-brick-consoles-arbitration https://www.instagram.com/p/DJmofHzPssV/ LAW AND LEXMARK https://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/basics/trademark-patent-copyright https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/1201 https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/1203 https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/1204 https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/16pdf/15-1189_ebfj.pdf SONY https://www.playstation.com/en-us/legal/psn-terms-of-service/ https://www.playstation.com/en-us/legal/ps5-ssla/ MICROSOFT https://www.microsoft.com/en-US/servicesagreement?msockid=1f7d7163a5b163ab143062bca4a4629e#14a_XboxLive (0:14) Introduction to Nintendo's User Agreement Changes (2:13) Nintendo's Ecosystem and Anti-Piracy Measures (5:20) Legal Analysis of Nintendo's New Prohibitions (8:28) User Rights and Legal Language in Nintendo's Agreement (10:09) Parental Consent, Termination, and Agreement Breach (18:41) Public Perception of Nintendo's Legal Changes (20:56) Copyright, DMCA, and Legal Penalties (25:04) Patent Law: Impression vs Lexmarks Case Study (27:19) Console Ownership: Switch vs PlayStation Comparison (31:30) Sony and Microsoft User Agreement Terms (38:05) Understanding and Protecting User Rights (39:24) Importance of EULA Awareness (40:39) Episode Wrap-Up and Final Disclaimer…

Virtual Legality

1
SAG AFTRA, Darth Vader, and the Future of Performance in a World of AI 23:38

11 weeks yang lalu23:38

23:38

In this episode, lawyer Richard Hoeg discusses the controversy surrounding Darth Vader's AI-generated voice in Fortnite and the resulting legal actions by SAG AFTRA. He discusses the implications of AI replacing human performers and SAG AFTRA's stance on the matter. The episode includes an analysis of the National Labor Relations Act, licensing issues, and the legal distinctions between filing charges and lawsuits. Hoeg also explores potential outcomes of the NLRB's findings on the complaint and the future of AI in voice acting contracts. The episode concludes with closing remarks and a call for listener feedback. LINKS AI VADER https://www.fortnite.com/news/this-will-be-a-day-long-remembered-speak-with-darth-vader-in-fortnite https://www.cnet.com/tech/gaming/ai-voiced-darth-vader-can-swear-say-skibidi-toilet-in-fortnite-how-to-find-it/ https://x.com/Fortnite/status/1923397890241593822 SAG AFTRA CHARGE https://x.com/IGN/status/1924616331057332619 https://www.ign.com/articles/voice-actor-union-files-unfair-labor-practice-charge-over-fortnites-ai-darth-vader https://www.sagaftra.org/sites/default/files/2025-05/Llama%20Productions%20ULP%20Charge.pdf https://www.sagaftra.org/sites/default/files/2025-03/IMA%20Comparison%20Chart.pdf THE LAW https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/29/158 https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/29/157 https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/29/159 (0:14) Introduction to the episode and topics (0:41) Darth Vader in Fortnite and AI voice controversy (2:40) SAG AFTRA's legal actions and implications (3:22) Call for listener support and Patreon (7:22) SAG AFTRA's stance on AI replacing human performers (9:23) Potential outcomes of NLRB's findings on the complaint (10:07) Legal distinctions between filings and lawsuits (11:06) Analysis of the National Labor Relations Act and licensing issues (16:31) Future of AI in voice acting contracts (21:42) Closing remarks and call for listener feedback…

Virtual Legality

1
What the Trump?! | USAID, Elon Musk, and the Roberts Court 43:27

22 weeks yang lalu43:27

43:27

In this episode, lawyer Richard Hoeg explores recent legal and political developments surrounding the Supreme Court's non-decision on USAID funding and related controversies. He covers the District Court's restraining order, the government's response, administrative stays, and the Supreme Court's 'decision'. Justice Alito's dissent on sovereign immunity and equitable jurisdiction is analyzed, along with discussions on irreparable harm and universal injunctions. Hoeg also touches on constitutional crises, the Impoundment Control Act, and spending authority conflicts, concluding with thoughts on the Constitutional order and engaging with the audience. SUPPORTING THE CHANNEL PATREON - https://www.patreon.com/VirtualLegality STORE - https://virtuallegalityshop.myshopify.com LINKS THE CONSTITUTION https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/article-1/#article-1-section-8-clause-1 https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-2/section-3/overview-of-take-care-clause USAID AND THE SUPREME COURT https://x.com/kyledcheney/status/1897287827324563593 https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24a831_3135.pdf https://ndlawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/NDL506_Bayefsky_6_06-cropped-1.pdf https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/irreparable_harm CRISES? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitutional_crisis https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/can-a-president-refuse-to-spend-funds-approved-by-congress https://x.com/HoegLaw/status/1894786831251657181 (0:14) Introduction to Virtual Legality and today's topics (1:09) Supreme Court's non-decision and political controversies (6:07) District Court's temporary restraining order and government's response (8:50) Understanding administrative stays and the Supreme Court's new timeline (20:46) Justice Alito's dissent on sovereign immunity and district court's enforcement (23:37) Analysis of equitable jurisdiction, monetary relief, and legal precedents (26:36) Irreparable harm and universal injunctions debate (30:03) Justice Alito's full dissent and the Supreme Court's stance (33:04) Constitutional crisis and presidential impoundment history (37:21) Impoundment Control Act, Line Item Veto, and spending authority conflicts (40:36) Constitutional arguments and recent presidential spending delays (41:52) Outro, support for the channel, and call for feedback (42:33) Potential constitutional crises and closing remarks…

Virtual Legality

1
Warner Bros., Monolith Closure, and the Legal Legacy of the Nemesis System 30:01

22 weeks yang lalu30:01

30:01

In this episode, lawyer Richard Hoeg discusses the recent Warner Brothers studio closures and reflects on the company's history in the video game industry, including Monolith Productions. He focuses on intellectual property issues in gaming, with references to the "No One Lives Forever" series and Monolith's Nemesis System. Richard clarifies different types of intellectual property and common misconceptions, providing legal perspectives on the studio closures and the Nemesis System patent. He explores the future of the Nemesis System, intellectual property licenses, and US Patent and Trademark Office challenges. The episode concludes with Richard's thoughts on the implications of intellectual property in gaming. LINKS CLOSURES/NOLF https://www.polygon.com/news/529310/warner-bros-games-monolith-productions-multiversus-studio-closure https://kotaku.com/the-sad-story-behind-a-dead-pc-game-that-cant-come-back-1688358811 NEMESIS HEADLINES https://kotaku.com/monolith-productions-middle-earth-nemesis-system-patent-1851766437 https://www.thegamer.com/warner-bros-owns-nemesis-system-until-2035-despite-monolith-closure/ https://www.ign.com/articles/after-warner-bros-shut-down-shadow-of-mordor-developer-monolith-and-canceled-wonder-woman-fans-lament-the-wasted-potential-of-its-nemesis-system https://www.eurogamer.net/shadow-of-mordors-brilliant-nemesis-system-is-locked-away-by-a-warner-bros-patent-until-2036-despite-studio-shutdown IP LAW/CONFUSION https://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/basics/trademark-patent-copyright https://x.com/BangBangClick/status/1894505752003309829 https://x.com/SynthPotato/status/1894467413502054717 THE PATENT/OPTIONS https://patents.google.com/patent/US20160279522A1/en https://www.videogameschronicle.com/features/opinion/is-warners-nemesis-patent-really-gross-im-not-sure-id-go-that-far/ https://michelsonip.com/fundamentals-of-ip-license/ https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/35/102 https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/35/103 https://www.theiplawblog.com/2021/03/articles/ip/how-to-challenge-a-patent-in-the-pto/ (0:14) Introduction and Warner Brothers Studio Closures (0:49) Warner Brothers' Video Game Industry History and Monolith Productions (3:40) Intellectual Property in Gaming: No One Lives Forever and Nemesis System (9:09) Intellectual Property Types and Misconceptions (14:12) Legal Perspectives on Studio Closures and the Nemesis System Patent (19:07) Future of the Nemesis System and Reflections on Past Discussions (22:00) Intellectual Property Licenses and USPTO Patent Issues (26:02) Patent Challenges and Potential Outcomes for the Nemesis System (28:17) Closing Thoughts on Intellectual Property in Gaming (29:12) Supporting the Podcast and Final Remarks…

Virtual Legality

1
What the Trump?! | Did an Executive Order just end the US Administrative State? (VL) 1:10:01

23 weeks yang lalu1:10:01

1:10:01

In this episode, lawyer Richard Hoeg explores executive orders and U.S. government structure, focusing on independent agencies versus presidential control. Using Trump's executive order as a case study, he discusses the administrative state, legal controversies, and public reactions. Hoeg reviews a law article on the unitary executive theory and Chief Justice Roberts' opinion in a case changing the structure of the CFPB. He discusses the FTC, exceptions to presidential removal authority, and the impact on other agencies. The episode concludes with insights on checks and balances, congressional authority, and the limits of executive orders. SUPPORTING THE CHANNEL PATREON - https://www.patreon.com/VirtualLegality STORE - https://virtuallegalityshop.myshopify.com LINKS THE EXECUTIVE ORDER (AND FACT SHEET) https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/02/ensuring-accountability-for-all-agencies/ https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2025/02/fact-sheet-president-donald-j-trump-reins-in-independent-agencies-to-restore-a-government-that-answers-to-the-american-people/ EXTREME RESPONSES https://x.com/allenanalysis/status/1891979647145197717 https://x.com/StephenM/status/1890600757205880940 LAW (REVIEW) https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdf/10.1086/714860 https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/necessary_and_proper_clause https://casetext.com/case/seila-law-llc-v-consumer-financial-protection-bureau OTHER RESPONSES https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-executive-order-interpret-law/ https://x.com/HoegLaw/status/1890038579310830043 https://x.com/WhiteHouse/status/1892295984928993698 (0:14) Introduction to the episode (0:39) Explanation of executive orders and U.S. government branches (2:07) Independent agencies vs. presidential control (3:12) Trump's executive order: language and implications (7:03) Role of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) (9:15) Legal interpretations, controversies, and public reactions (13:44) Review of law article on unitary executive theory (23:34) Chief justice Roberts' opinion and CFPB case analysis (25:05) Historical context of the CFPB and presidential removal power (31:05) FTC's role and the extent of executive power (33:01) Exceptions to the president's removal authority (35:51) Court's opinion: minimalist vs. maximalist readings (37:33) Impact on independent agencies: FTC, FCC, SEC (39:02) Critique of chief justice Roberts' approach (39:28) Future of unitary executive theory (41:44) Scope and methodology of unitary executive theory (43:46) Necessary and proper clause implications (46:10) Unitary executive theory vs. congressional authority (50:18) Originalist vs. non-originalist perspectives on executive power (1:00:02) Risks of concentrated power: importance of checks and balances (1:03:00) Congressional authority and power delegation (1:05:11) Limits of presidential executive orders (1:06:15) DOJ stance on regulatory commissions and political reactions (1:08:23) Support for Virtual Legality and public discourse importance (1:09:23) Disclaimer and closing remarks…

Virtual Legality

1
Roblox Under Scrutiny | Federal Investigations, Child Safety, and More 22:27

25 weeks yang lalu22:27

22:27

In this episode, lawyer Richard Hoeg delves into the complexities surrounding Roblox, its platform, and the recent scrutiny it faces. He begins with an overview of Roblox's popularity and the criticisms it has attracted. The discussion then shifts to the SEC's investigation into Roblox, explaining securities and the implications of Bloomberg's reporting on child safety. Richard also examines short selling, focusing on Hindenburg Research's report and its potential impacts on Roblox. The episode further explores user screening, COPPA implications, and the importance of transparency in ongoing investigations, concluding with closing remarks and audience engagement. SUPPORTING THE CHANNEL PATREON - https://www.patreon.com/VirtualLegality STORE - https://virtuallegalityshop.myshopify.com LINKS ROBLOX INVESTIGATION https://www.gamedeveloper.com/business/sec-confirms-active-and-ongoing-investigation-into-roblox https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-02-07/sec-confirms-game-service-roblox-part-of-active-investigation FOIA https://www.foia.gov/about.html https://www.foia.gov/ AGENCIES https://www.sec.gov/about https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/rules/childrens-online-privacy-protection-rule-coppa https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/contact/complaints https://www.justice.gov/criminal/criminal-ceos/keeping-children-safe-online (0:14) Introduction to the episode (0:43) Overview of Roblox's platform, popularity, and criticisms (2:03) SEC's investigation into Roblox and explanation of securities (3:53) Bloomberg's reporting and child safety allegations against Roblox (7:16) Short selling, Hindenburg Research's report, and potential impacts (10:23) User screening, COPPA implications, and transparency in investigations (21:11) Closing remarks and audience engagement…

Virtual Legality

1
TikTok, Microsoft, and Legal Challenges | Exploring the Ban and Beyond 39:57

26 weeks yang lalu39:57

39:57

In this episode, lawyer Richard Hoeg explores the prospect of Microsoft/TikTok acquisition talks. He examines the TikTok ban, enforcement challenges, and network impacts. Hoeg analyzes the performative aspects of January 19th, discusses bills of attainder, and the courts' decisions on both attainder and First Amendment law. He critiques the court's reasoning, discusses TikTok's business restrictions, and debates divestiture versus confiscation. Richard also touches on the Trump administration's actions, Congressional provisions, First Amendment concerns, and the Supreme Court's role. The episode concludes with insights into Microsoft's negotiation strategy and political considerations. SUPPORTING THE CHANNEL YOUTUBE - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCi5RTzzeCFurWTPLm8usDkQ/ PATREON - https://www.patreon.com/VirtualLegality STORE - https://virtuallegalityshop.myshopify.com/ LINKS INTRO https://www.reuters.com/technology/trump-says-microsoft-is-talks-acquire-tiktok-2025-01-28/ THE BAN https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-118publ50/pdf/PLAW-118publ50.pdf https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/bill_of_attainder https://cases.justia.com/federal/appellate-courts/cadc/24-1113/24-1113-2024-12-06.pdf?ts=1733499080 https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24-656_ca7d.pdf THE DELAY https://apnews.com/article/trump-tiktok-ban-da11df6d59c17e2c17eea40c4042386d https://www.npr.org/2025/01/20/nx-s1-5268701/trump-executive-order-tiktok-ban https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/application-of-protecting-americans-from-foreign-adversary-controlled-applications-act-to-tiktok/ THE PROBLEM https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/articles/article-ii/clauses/348 https://apnews.com/article/tiktok-ban-executive-order-trump-0bbae2d2d6f102944f41bb75ad40ce69 https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-brushes-tiktok-national-security-concerns-calling-50/story?id=117923145 THE SOLUTION? https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2025/01/03/the-golden-opportunity-for-american-ai/ (0:00) Introduction and episode overview (0:46) Microsoft and TikTok acquisition talks and Protecting Americans Act (2:10) TikTok ban implications, enforcement, and network impact (4:54) Performative aspects and bill of attainder analysis (7:53) Court's decision and discussion on law's punitive nature (9:48) Court's tests and critique of reasoning (11:11) TikTok's business restrictions and divestiture vs. confiscation debate (14:08) Case history, Trump administration, and executive orders (17:10) Congressional act provisions and First Amendment considerations (20:29) Supreme Court's decisions on TikTok's shutdown and implications (22:06) Executive order analysis and presidential powers (24:33) Legal challenges to non-enforcement and take care clause implications (28:31) Enforcement discretion and Congressional conditions for TikTok (32:26) Legal challenges to Trump's order and TikTok's potential sale (34:09) Microsoft's negotiation role and political strategy (37:34) Final thoughts, community engagement, and channel support (39:33) Legal disclaimer and closing remarks…

Virtual Legality

1
FTC Takes on Genshin Impact | Loot Boxes, Dark Patterns, and Legal Showdowns 1:16:04

27 weeks yang lalu1:16:04

1:16:04

In this episode, Richard Hoeg examines the FTC's lawsuit against Genshin Impact, focusing on loot boxes and transparency. He discusses the FTC's charges, including concerns over "dark pattern tactics" and COPPA compliance, and the implications for free-to-play games. The episode explores Hoyoverse's business practices, misleading loot box disclosures, and the FTC's authority under sections 5 and 6g. Richard also addresses marketing to children, settlement terms, and the broader impact on the gaming industry, concluding with a look at internal FTC debates. FTC ACTION https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2025/01/genshin-impact-game-developer-will-be-banned-selling-lootboxes-teens-under-16-without-parental https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/cognosphere_complaint.pdf LAWS https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-16/chapter-I/subchapter-C/part-312 https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/45 https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?hl=false&edition=prelim&req=granuleid%3AUSC-prelim-title15-section46 CONTROVERSY/AUTHORITY https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/LSB/LSB10635 https://businesslaw.osbar.org/2024/12/31/federal-trade-commission-non-compete-ban-december-2024-update/ https://www.beckersasc.com/asc-news/trump-administration-likely-to-end-ftc-efforts-to-ban-noncompetes-report.html https://www.econotimes.com/Lina-Khan-Resigns-as-FTC-Chair-Amid-Antitrust-Legacy-1699716 https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/ferguson-cognosphere-concurrence.pdf (0:00) Introduction to the episode (0:46) FTC lawsuit against Genshin Impact and loot boxes (3:14) FTC's charges against Genshin Impact and transparency issues (5:25) FTC's concerns with "dark pattern tactics" and COPPA requirements (7:57) Implications for free-to-play games and FTC enforcement (10:34) Jurisdiction and legal basis for FTC's case against Genshin Impact (16:50) Specifics of COPPA rule and FTC's interpretation (20:05) Broader implications for the gaming industry and age gates (24:29) FTC's investigation into Hoyoverse's business practices (31:38) Currency and loot box practices in Genshin Impact (37:14) Hoyoverse's advertising and influencer collaborations (39:48) Misleading disclosure of loot box odds and unfair practices (47:31) Gaming business models and FTC's focus on children (51:22) FTC's authority and rulemaking under section 5 and 6g (55:50) Settlement terms and broader video game industry implications (1:00:00) Major questions doctrine and anti-delegation concerns (1:03:36) FTC and loot boxes, plus ban on noncompetes (1:05:43) Andrew Ferguson's role and allegations against Cognosphere LLC (1:07:26) Loot boxes, odds, and misleading advertising (1:09:46) Virtual currency complexity and FTC's consumer protection stance (1:12:21) Marketing to children and differing opinions within FTC (1:14:23) Conclusion, viewer engagement, and disclaimer…

Virtual Legality

1
DoD Puts Tencent under Fire | What EVERYONE'S Getting Wrong (VL) 32:48

28 weeks yang lalu32:48

32:48

In this episode, Richard Hoeg explores the US Department of Defense's CMC designation and its business impacts on Tencent Holdings. He covers legal background, executive orders, and insights from Bloomberg, analyzing market reactions and clarifying misunderstandings. The discussion includes the National Defense Authorization Act, Trump's executive orders, and more. Hoeg provides historical context, examines Tencent's situation, and the Department of Defense's role in US-China relations. He also considers potential actions by the future administrations and their effects on Tencent's global market presence, concluding with national security debates and possible legal proceedings. LINKS MILITARY DESIGNATION https://www.theverge.com/2025/1/6/24337489/tencent-catl-us-defense-department-chinese-military-companies https://archive.ph/FPpBi https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2025-00070.pdf TRUMP/1237 https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/12/trump-bans-investments-in-companies-that-aid-chinas-military.html https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/11/17/2020-25459/addressing-the-threat-from-securities-investments-that-finance-communist-chinese-military-companies https://www.defense.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/2328894/dod-releases-list-of-additional-companies-in-accordance-with-section-1237-of-fy/ MCFs AND 1260H https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/chinese-military-civil-fusion-and-section-1260h-congress-incorporates-defense-contributors https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brookings_Institution https://www.cmtradelaw.com/2024/02/dod-is-making-its-list-and-checking-it-twice-dod-updates-1260h-chinese-military-companies-list/ LEGAL ACTION? https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c9q78wn9g8zo https://www.eurogamer.net/tencent-threatens-legal-proceedings-if-us-doesnt-overturn-decision-to-label-it-as-a-chinese-military-company https://www.rockpapershotgun.com/worlds-biggest-game-publisher-tencent-threaten-to-sue-us-government-for-listing-them-as-a-chinese-military-company https://static.www.tencent.com/uploads/2025/01/07/ed277c23e9fe0fc870fb9f02350e7658.pdf https://www.theverge.com/2024/10/19/24274153/dji-sues-us-dod-chinese-military-company (0:00) Introduction and overview of the topic (1:12) US Department of Defense's designation explained and potential business impacts (2:35) Legal background, executive orders, and Bloomberg article insights (3:33) Market reactions, Citigroup analyst perspective, and clarification of sanctions (5:39) Examination of William M. Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act and Federal Register details (7:27) Trump's executive order, section 1237 vs 1260h, and legal implications (10:22) Historical context, reporting requirements, and legislative amendments (13:05) Definitions, implications for Tencent, and legal interpretations (15:04) Department of Defense's discretion and implications for US-China relations (17:23) Potential future actions by the Biden administration and Brookings Institution's perspective (20:49) Specific prohibitions and overview of Tencent's global market presence (22:57) Tencent's gaming investments and impact of US designation (25:02) Clarification on the CMC list, potential legal proceedings, and DJI precedent (30:12) US government actions, national security debate, and closing remarks…

Virtual Legality

1
Assassin's Creed Delayed...Again | Analyzing Ubisoft's Movement from the Shadows 25:18

29 weeks yang lalu25:18

25:18

In this episode, Richard Hoeg dives into the recent delay of Assassin's Creed Shadows and the broader financial challenges faced by Ubisoft. He discusses Ubisoft's official announcements, strategic updates, restructuring efforts, and cost reduction measures. Hoeg explores the legal implications surrounding potential sales of Ubisoft, along with the financial impact of game cancellations. He provides an analysis of Ubisoft's recent game performance and shares insights from Bloomberg regarding Ubisoft shares and Tencent's interest. The episode also covers organizational changes within Ubisoft, before concluding with a sponsor message, disclaimer, and closing remarks. *** SUPPORT THE SHOW UTREON/PLAYEUR - https://playeur.com/c/aT-zMZf4XVIxwix2pAVNjE/videos/virtual-legality PATREON - https://www.patreon.com/VirtualLegality STORE - https://virtuallegalityshop.myshopify.com/ LINKS DELAY ANNOUNCEMENTS https://x.com/assassinscreed/status/1838971189722562906 https://x.com/AlmightyJCaesar/status/1877406586890568139 STRATEGIC CHANGES https://staticctf.ubisoft.com/8aefmxkxpxwl/1wUjJWUQSIVMlZbKQ2707e/c0b1cd1c71ab30838e51d5e24764577f/Press_release_09_01_2025_vfinal.pdf ARTICLES https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-10-04/tencent-guillemot-family-are-said-to-consider-buyout-of-ubisoft?srnd=undefined https://www.videogameschronicle.com/features/opinion/the-crisis-at-ubisoft-has-deepened-and-the-end-result-is-inevitable/ LAST STAND MEDIA https://www.patreon.com/LastStandMedia THE BITCAST https://www.youtube.com/@seasonedgaming NOTHING YET TO DISCLOSE https://www.ign.com/articles/ubisoft-investors-grill-ceo-cfo-on-potential-tencent-sale-delays-and-financial-woes https://www.gamespot.com/articles/ubisoft-refuses-to-comment-on-tencent-rumors-but-says-its-exploring-options-to-maximize-value/1100-6528718/ https://www.sec.gov/about/offices/oia/oia_corpfin/princdisclos.pdf TENCENT https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/07/tech/tencent-catl-us-list-china-military-companies-intl-hnk/index.html (0:00) Introduction to the episode and Assassin's Creed Shadows delays (1:52) Ubisoft's official announcements and financial challenges (5:37) Ubisoft's strategic updates, restructuring, and cost reductions (11:57) Legal implications of Ubisoft's potential sales (14:18) Game cancellations, geography, and financial impact (17:09) Ubisoft's recent game performance analysis (19:13) Bloomberg's insights on Ubisoft shares and Tencent's interest (23:27) Organizational changes at Ubisoft (24:21) Sponsor: PlayYour and Patreon support (24:54) Disclaimer and closing remarks…

Virtual Legality

1
My Stroke Story | 2nd Anniversary - Starting is Restarting (VL Extra) 7:20

31 weeks yang lalu7:20

7:20

In this episode, Richard Hoeg presents a special anniversary edition, sharing personal insights and experiences following a stroke. He discusses the mental rehabilitation journey, offering a post-stroke perspective on the challenges faced, including financial stress. Richard delves into energy management strategies and reflects on the future outlook, both personally and professionally. The episode concludes with closing remarks and a disclaimer, providing a thoughtful and introspective look into recovery and resilience. (0:00) Introduction and Anniversary Specials Overview (1:07) Stroke Experiences and Mental Rehabilitation (3:24) Post-Stroke Perspective and Financial Stress (5:37) Energy Management and Future Outlook (6:25) Closing Remarks and Disclaimer…

Virtual Legality

1
Sony Eyes Kadokawa Acquisition: Implications for Gaming and Anime Markets 57:15

36 weeks yang lalu57:15

57:15

In this episode, Richard Hoeg dives into the potential acquisition of Kadokawa by Sony, examining the pricing process regulatory questions and more. Richard explores Sony's stake in Kadokawa, the company's anime involvement, and potential antitrust issues. He provides insights into Sony's acquisition history and financials, the implications of leaked information, and the role of cash in acquisitions. The episode also touches on Tencent's influence, anime market monopolization worries, and jurisdictional challenges for international companies, concluding with thoughts on regulatory concerns and FromSoft's potential independence. LINKS INITIAL REPORTS https://www.reuters.com/markets/deals/sony-talks-buy-media-powerhouse-behind-elden-ring-sources-say-2024-11-19/ https://www.videogameschronicle.com/news/sony-is-reportedly-in-talks-to-acquire-fromsoftware-owner-kadokawa/ LOI https://ssl4.eir-parts.net/doc/9468/ir_material7/240956/00.pdf https://www.acc.com/sites/default/files/resources/vl/membersonly/SampleFormPolicy/1386759_1.pdf PRICE https://companiesmarketcap.com/kadokawa/marketcap/ https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/SONY/sony/cash-on-hand https://firstpagesage.com/business/valuation-ebitda-multiples-for-tech-companies/ https://pitchbook.com/profiles/company/65345-59#stock https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/9468.T/key-statistics/ https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/MSFT/microsoft/cash-on-hand https://news.microsoft.com/2022/01/18/microsoft-to-acquire-activision-blizzard-to-bring-the-joy-and-community-of-gaming-to-everyone-across-every-device/ https://stockanalysis.com/stocks/atvi/financials/ratios/ TENCENT AND FROMSOFTWARE https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kadokawa_Corporation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FromSoftware ANIME AND REGULATORS https://comicbook.com/anime/news/sony-kadokawa-anime-monopoly/ https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/2023_merger_guidelines_final_12.18.2023.pdf (0:00) Introduction to Sony's potential acquisition of Kadokawa (1:09) Pronunciation and initial report overview (1:44) Acquisition process and regulatory approvals (2:31) Microsoft's Activision purchase comparison (3:05) Game exclusivity and regulatory concerns (4:11) Sony's stake in Kadokawa and pricing (5:22) Kadokawa's anime involvement and antitrust issues (6:13) Sony's acquisition history and financials (8:51) Understanding the letter of intent in deals (13:17) Implications of leaked acquisition information (23:49) Merger and acquisition deal numbers (25:22) Company valuation with EBITDA (29:27) Role of cash in acquisitions (31:04) Microsoft's Activision acquisition implications (33:39) Tencent's influence on Sony's Kadokawa bid (37:43) Anime market monopolization concerns (41:13) Antitrust markets and Sony-Kadokawa deal implications (44:44) Conclusion and viewer support (46:03) CMA considerations on streaming platforms (47:24) Jurisdictional challenges for international companies (47:59) Digital product loss and Sony's closing information (48:48) Kadokawa's stock compensation considerations (50:11) FromSoft's control and exclusivity agreements (51:34) Sony-Kadokawa special agreement potential (53:12) Regulatory concerns with Sony's studio additions (54:08) Sony region lock and FromSoft game access (55:09) FromSoft's potential independence announcement (56:05) Final thoughts and episode closing…

Virtual Legality

1
Can Nintendo's Patents TAKE DOWN Palworld? | A Lawyer Discusses 1:10:04

37 weeks yang lalu1:10:04

1:10:04

Richard Hoeg dives into the ongoing legal battle between Nintendo and PocketPair, focusing on the intricacies of patent law and its implications for the gaming industry. Starting with the background on Palworld, he explores Nintendo's legal actions and the broader context of patent strategies. The episode examines social media reactions, the strength of Nintendo's case, and the potential for settlement. Richard describes patent laws between Japan and the US, discusses Nintendo's history with lawfare, and considers the impact on public perception. He analyzes the role of patent trolls, the nemesis system patent, and the balance between lawsuit motivations and innovation, concluding with community engagement. SOURCE LINKS POCKETPAIR https://www.pocketpair.jp/news/20241108 TWEETS https://x.com/seosaur/status/1854930016238256230 https://x.com/Schwifter_/status/1855481661086974033 https://x.com/Florian4Gamers/status/1854879805365236216 PATENTS https://patents.google.com/patent/JP7545191B1/en#relatedApplications https://patents.google.com/patent/JP7493117B2/en?oq=7493117#relatedApplications https://patents.google.com/patent/JP7528390B2/en#relatedApplications https://patents.google.com/patent/JP7398425B2/en?oq=7493117#relatedApplications JAPAN https://www.jpo.go.jp/e/faq/yokuaru/patent.html US https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/patent https://www.uspto.gov/ip-policy/international-ip-treaties https://www.wipo.int/directory/en/details.jsp?country_code=JP CONTINUATIONS https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1756-2171.12446?msockid=1f7d7163a5b163ab143062bca4a4629e DAMAGES https://www.forbes.com/sites/paultassi/2024/11/08/nintendos-palworld-lawsuit-takes-an-absurd-turn/ https://x.com/IGN/status/1855007664662561234 BULLYING? https://gamesfray.com/nintendo-the-pokemon-company-v-pocketpair-palworld-patent-infringement-lawsuit-attempts-to-monopolize-game-rules/?utm_source=syndication (0:00) Introduction and episode overview (1:33) Background on Palworld and Nintendo's legal actions (3:17) Patent discussion (6:48) Social media reactions and detailed patent analysis (22:08) Continuation: Nintendo's legal strategy and case strength (25:11) Potential settlement and implications for Pocketpair (27:47) Understanding patents and international patent law (38:59) Patent strategies (45:21) Patent claims in gaming: Legal and industry impact (51:18) Patent and copyright laws: Japan vs. the US (53:15) Lawfare in the Nintendo-PocketPair case and calculating damages (58:11) Nintendo's legal history and public perception (1:04:41) Patent trolls and novelty in gaming patents (1:07:01) Nintendo's lawsuit motivations and innovation balance (1:08:14) The nemesis system patent discussion (1:09:06) Closing remarks and community engagement…

Virtual Legality

1
California Outlaws the 'BUY' Button?!? | A Lawyer's Take (787) 54:06

44 weeks yang lalu54:06

54:06

In this episode, Richard Hoeg dives into California's AB 2426, focusing on digital content ownership and its implications for platforms like the PlayStation Network. He examines legal perspectives on digital goods, compelled speech, and transparency laws. Assembly Member Jackie Irwin's press release and task force recommendations are explored, along with a detailed breakdown of the new law's definitions and provisions. Richard discusses potential adaptations by companies, false advertising concerns, and ambiguities within the law. The episode also covers DRM, online check-ins, and listener questions, concluding with opinions on media preservation, the EU's gaming initiatives, and emulator shutdowns. DISCUSSED IN THIS EPISODE (LINKS) ARTICLES https://www.gamefile.news/p/california-ab2426-crew-call-of-duty https://www.theverge.com/2024/9/26/24254922/california-digital-purchase-disclosure-law-ab-2426 https://www.ign.com/articles/californias-new-law-will-force-storefronts-to-disclose-that-buyers-dont-actually-own-their-digitally-purchased-media https://kotaku.com/california-ab-2426-digital-games-the-crew-new-law-psn https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/other/california-cracks-down-on-misleading-online-purchases-with-ab-2426 LAWS https://a42.asmdc.org/press-releases/20240925-governor-newsom-signs-ab-2426-law-increases-transparency-surrounding https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/109 https://digitaldemocracy.calmatters.org/bills/ca_202320240ab2426 TOTILO TWEETS https://x.com/stephentotilo/status/1839675181129675168 https://x.com/stephentotilo/status/1841152304457634075 PSN TERMS https://www.playstation.com/en-us/legal/psn-terms-of-service/#content-license-and-restrictions (0:00) Introduction to California's AB 2426 and digital content ownership (5:16) Legal perspectives on digital goods and PlayStation Network's terms (9:07) Compelled speech, transparency laws, and public understanding (14:02) Assembly Member Jackie Irwin's press release and task force recommendations (19:02) Detailed breakdown of the new law's definitions and provisions (23:11) How companies might adapt to new licensing requirements and consumer behavior (27:09) The law as false advertising, exemptions, and ambiguities (32:29) Online check-ins, DRM, and the law's effectiveness (34:37) Sponsor: Acknowledgment and community support (35:17) Listener questions and discussion on the law's adoption and impact (47:25) Opinions on the EU's stop killing games initiative and emulator shutdowns (50:35) Media preservation and impact on accessibility (53:00) Closing remarks and engagement reminders…

Virtual Legality

1
Patent World | A Lawyer's Take on Nintendo vs PalWorld 1:05:44

44 weeks yang lalu1:05:44

1:05:44

Lawyer Richard Hoeg (Hoeg Law) provides an in-depth analysis of Nintendo's lawsuit against PocketPair, focusing on the legal intricacies of patent infringement claims. He revisits the background of Palworld and explores international and Japanese patent law implications on the case. Richard dissects the differences between trademark, patent, and copyright protection, and speculates on PocketPair's legal response and strategy. The episode explores the risks associated with evoking established brands, the role of patent functions, and the potential impact on game releases. Concluding with viewer comments and a discussion on Nintendo's motives, Hoeg offers insights into the broader implications for the gaming industry. DISCUSSED IN THIS EPISODE (LINKS) CORPORATE STATEMENTS https://www.nintendo.co.jp/corporate/release/en/2024/240919.html https://www.pocketpair.jp/news/news16 https://corporate.pokemon.co.jp/media/news/detail/335.html UNDERSTANDING INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY https://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/basics/trademark-patent-copyright https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/PatentBasics_UCR_11May2022.pdf https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/PatentBasics_UCR_11May2022.pdf https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Madison/01-10-02-0248 JAPAN https://www.uspto.gov/learning-and-resources/pursuing-international-ip-protection/japan https://www.ymf-law.com/post/defenses-to-patent-infringement-in-japanese-litigation ANALYSTS AND ARTICLES https://x.com/Jenbox360/status/1836709372077953278 https://www.msn.com/en-gb/money/other/nintendo-s-patent-lawsuit-shows-it-s-given-up-making-the-case-that-palworld-s-characters-are-similar-to-pokemon-s-analyst-explains https://www.ign.com/articles/nintendo-vs-palworld-killer-patent-may-be-about-the-mechanic-of-catching-pokmon https://www.eurogamer.net/exceedingly-plausible-nintendo-crafted-patent-claims-to-specifically-target-palworld-says-ip-expert https://www.dualshockers.com/nintendo-lawsuit-halts-palworld-ps5-release-in-japan/ PC GAMER LAWYER INTERVIEW https://www.pcgamer.com/games/survival-crafting/a-videogame-patent-lawyer-breaks-down-nintendos-risky-palworld-lawsuit-it-definitely-feels-like-a-punishment/ (0:00) Introduction and Overview of Nintendo's Lawsuit Against PocketPair (1:07) Recap: Palworld, Copyright Law, and Nintendo's Legal Action (2:31) International Law and Japanese Patent Law (3:49) Analysis of Nintendo's Patent Infringement Claims (5:28) Predictions for PocketPair's Legal Outcome (7:08) Clarifying the Nature of Nintendo's Patent-Based Lawsuit (8:16) Trademark, Patent, and Copyright: Understanding the Differences (13:19) PocketPair's Response and Legal Strategy Speculation (16:17) Detailed Discussion on Patent Implications in Legal Disputes (22:15) Copyright vs. Patent Protection in Nintendo's Strategy (24:13) Risks of Evoking Established Brands and Intellectual Property (26:25) Patent Functions and Relevance to Nintendo's Case (28:48) Pocket Pair's Potential Legal Strategies and Patent Analysis (33:07) Divisional Patents and Their Litigation Significance (37:42) Adjustments to Avoid Infringement; Journalistic Speculations (40:34) Strategic Impact of the Lawsuit on Game Releases (41:46) Analyzing Nintendo's Motives and Patent Approaches (47:12) Proving Patent Infringement and Filing Scopes (50:20) Nintendo's Goodwill and Japanese Patent Law Discussion (52:09) Viewer Comments and Encouragement to Read Relevant Articles (54:05) Nintendo's Patent Strategy and Related Gaming Discussions (59:13) Miscellaneous: Settlements, Weekend Plans, and Board Games (1:01:06) Game Mechanics, Patents, and Software Expression (1:04:25) Closing Remarks and Legal Disclaimer…

Virtual Legality

1
Playing Games or Real Intentions? | Dr. Disrespect, Illegality, and Immorality (VL785) 1:16:00

1 year yang lalu1:16:00

1:16:00

Richard Hoeg dives into Midnight Society's statement about Guy Beam (Doctor Disrespect), explores the controversy surrounding his Twitch ban, analyzes California law on harmful communication with minors, and discusses a Bloomberg article and legal considerations related to the case. LINKS TWITTER LEAK https://x.com/evoli/status/1804309358106546676 MIDNIGHT SOCIETY https://x.com/12am/status/1805341504086622355 https://x.com/fourzerotwo/status/1805671144412049732 ARTICLES https://www.msn.com/en-xl/news/other/streamer-dr-disrespect-axed-by-his-gaming-company/ar-BB1oRnXU?ocid=BingNewsSerp https://metro.co.uk/2024/06/26/dr-disrespect-loses-40-000-followers-streamers-fans-cut-ties-21106425/?ico=mosaic_gaming https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/dr-disrespect-signs-multi-year-deal-stay-twitch-1283878/ https://gamerant.com/turtle-beach-dr-disrespect-partnership-end/ TWITCH TERMS https://www.twitch.tv/p/en/legal/terms-of-service/ https://safety.twitch.tv/s/article/Community-Guidelines?language=en_US LAW https://codes.findlaw.com/ca/penal-code/pen-sect-288-2/ BLOOMBERG https://x.com/cecianasta/status/1805648131754746329 https://www.bloomberg.com./news/articles/2024-06-25/youtuber-dr-disrespect-was-allegedly-kicked-off-twitch-for-messaging-minor?sref=9YEaDeJj DISRESPECT STATEMENT https://x.com/DrDisrespect/status/1805668256088572089 TWEETS https://x.com/chrissyxchi/status/1805747160547475765 https://x.com/rellim714/status/1805734437445128543 YOUTUBE TERMS https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/2801999?hl=en&ref_topic=9282679 https://www.youtube.com/static?template=terms (0:00) Introduction (2:10) Midnight Society's statement on Guy Beam (Doctor Disrespect) (4:08) Dispute over interaction details and Twitch's reaction (6:12) Background on Doctor Disrespect's Twitch ban and statement (11:16) California law on harmful matter and communication with minors (18:13) Bloomberg article on Doctor Disrespect's ban (23:48) Doctor Disrespect's statement and legal considerations…

Virtual Legality

1
Whisper Campaign | A Lawyer looks at the Dr. Disrespect Twitch Accusations (VL784) 1:03:16

1 year yang lalu1:03:16

1:03:16

Richard Hoeg discusses the Doctor Disrespect Twitch exclusivity deal, the impact of Mixer's shutdown, and the 2022 legal settlement. He explores Twitch's whisper function, California penal code implications, and Doctor Disrespect's response to allegations, wrapping up with viewer questions and engagement. LINKS PREVIOUSLY ON... https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL1zDCgJzZUy98pOuP1cC8o7nraoJEcmuG https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/dr-disrespect-signs-multi-year-deal-stay-twitch-1283878/ https://www.windowscentral.com/mixer-what-went-wrong https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidthier/2020/06/28/statement-respond-why-dr-disrespect-banned-from-twitch-for-mysterious-reasons/#2f9151d12c0e https://x.com/Slasher/status/1276742960286183424 https://x.com/Shannon_Liao/status/1276617617730568195 https://x.com/drdisrespect/status/1277060051744591872 https://x.com/DrDisrespect/status/1502004274993131525 THE PRESENT https://blog.twitch.tv/en/2015/06/10/psst-hey-you-let-s-whisper-2a84ac496804/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whispering_campaign https://x.com/evoli/status/1804309358106546676 https://x.com/HoegLaw/status/1804484984213741891 https://x.com/DrDisrespect/status/1804337822415097955 https://x.com/DrDisrespect/status/1804577136998776878 THE FUTURE https://codes.findlaw.com/ca/penal-code/pen-sect-288-4/ https://oag.ca.gov/sites/all/files/agweb/pdfs/info_bulletins/2020-dle-17.pdf https://www.twitch.tv/p/en/legal/privacy-notice/ https://techcrunch.com/2018/05/07/encrypted-dms/ https://techcrunch.com/2023/03/06/elon-musk-says-twitter-aiming-to-roll-out-encrypted-dms-this-month/ https://x.com/HUN2R/status/1804538910099313132 (0:00) Introduction and episode overview (1:19) Viewer questions and engagement (1:33) Background on Doctor Disrespect and Twitch (2:35) Doctor Disrespect's Twitch exclusivity deal (4:40) Mixer shutdown and its impact (8:28) Legal settlement in 2022 (10:22) Twitch's whisper function and potential implications (25:08) Doctor Disrespect's response to allegations (35:20) Analysis of California penal code (56:08) Final thoughts and wrap-up…

Virtual Legality

1
Does Adobe Want to Spy On You? |What Its Terms of Use Say (and Don't) (VL783) 34:28

1 year yang lalu34:28

34:28

Richard Hoeg delves into Adobe's new terms and conditions, addressing artists' concerns and examining the legal implications. He discusses professional obligations, confidentiality issues, and the broad language in Adobe's terms, along with AI concerns and the impact on user trust. DISCUSSED IN THIS EPISODE ARTIST CONCERNS (TWEETS) https://x.com/Stretchedwiener/status/1798153619285708909 https://x.com/SamSantala/status/1798292952219091042 https://x.com/Gahadmor/status/1798601215703761272 ADOBE GENERAL TERMS https://www.adobe.com/legal/terms.html ADOBE CONTENT ANALYSIS RESTRICTIONS (INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE) https://helpx.adobe.com/manage-account/using/machine-learning-faq.html ARCHIVES/ALL SOFTWARE TERMS https://www.adobe.com/legal/licenses-terms/licenses-terms-archive.html https://www.adobe.com/legal/licenses-terms.html (0:00) Introduction and episode overview (1:12) Adobe's new terms and conditions and artists' concerns (3:31) Richard's perspective as a lawyer (5:02) Professional obligations and confidentiality concerns (7:07) Examination of Adobe's general terms of use (9:47) Detailed review of Adobe's access to user content (15:43) Limits on Adobe's use of user content (18:31) Broad language in Adobe's terms of use (23:07) AI concerns and Adobe's future plans (24:19) Concluding thoughts on Adobe's terms and user trust…

Virtual Legality

1
TikTok Sues the US | Can They Stop the Ban? (VL782) 1:30:30

1 year yang lalu1:30:30

1:30:30

In this episode, Richard Hoeg dives into the legal complexities surrounding TikTok's ban and its implications on freedom of expression and the limits of congressional authority. DISCUSSED IN THIS EPISODE NPR ARTICLE https://www.npr.org/2024/05/07/1246532784/tiktok-ban-us-court-biden-congress THE STATUTE https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/8038/text THE LAWSUIT https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/24651190/tiktok-petition.pdf ANALYSIS https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artI-S9-C3-2/ALDE_00013187/ (0:00) Introduction, Remembering Community Member Shareen (7:06) TikTok's Legal Arguments (20:17) Analysis of the Ban's Implications: First Amendment, Freedom of Expression, and the Bill of Attainder Clause (32:54) Examination of the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act (41:48) Future Outlook: Changing Political Landscape and Potential Legislative Actions Against TikTok (51:08) Breakdown of TikTok's Ownership and Funding, and Legal Battles with President Trump's executive order (1:01:06) TikTok's First Amendment Rights in its Editorial and Publishing Activities and Legal Challenge Against the Act (1:14:26) Discussion on the National Security Agreement with TikTok and Government's Failure to Provide Alternatives (1:20:18) TikTok's Request for a Declaratory Judgment that the Act is Unconstitutional and Audience's Comments (1:27:35) Community Questions: Personal Experience with TikTok, Opinion on China's Ban, and U.S Government's Stance (1:29:33) Closing Remarks and Remembering Community Member Shareen…

Virtual Legality

1
Can the FTC Really Ban Non-Competition Provisions? (VL781) 1:23:17

1 year yang lalu1:23:17

1:23:17

In this episode, Richard Hoeg delves into the complexities of Non-Compete Agreements, the Federal Trade Commission Act, and its implications. He examines the FTC's rulemaking on non-competes, the benefits and potential impacts of such agreements, and the origins of the FTC Act. He also discusses the non-delegation doctrine's potential impacts on FTC's authority. The episode wraps up with a Q&A session. (0:00) Introduction and Overview of Non-Compete Agreements (8:18) Understanding the Federal Trade Commission Act and Its Implications (14:07) The Proposed Non-Compete Rule and its Implications (23:01) Purpose and Impact of the FTC's Rulemaking on Non-Competes (33:35) Benefits and Potential Impact of Non-Compete Agreements (38:14) Origins and Intent of the FTC Act and Section 5 (44:26) Discussing the National Petroleum Refinance Association vs the FTC Case (51:03) The Non-Delegation Doctrine and Its Potential Impact on FTC's Authority (1:00:15) Handling Noncompete Provisions Amidst the FTC's Rule (1:03:02) Transition to Q&A and Acknowledgement of Viewer Support…

Virtual Legality

1
Stroke Awards Celebration Livestream (with Friends!) (VL Extra) 3:04:56

1 year yang lalu3:04:56

3:04:56

In this episode, Richard Hoeg and guests reflect on his stroke recovery, discuss his advocacy for early detection, and celebrate his award recognition. They delve into the Karen Read trial and the Bungie lawsuit, shedding light on the gaming industry's culture. They also share personal experiences with mental health, discuss the making of the Lawyers and Dragons show, and talk about future collaborations. (0:00) Introduction and Welcome (1:29) Technical difficulties and guest takeover (4:04) Richard Hoeg's award recognition and community support (8:16) Reflection on Richard's stroke recovery and advocacy for early detection (22:06) Discussion on the making of the Lawyers and Dragons show and audience interactions (48:03) In-depth discussion on the ongoing Karen Reed trial (1:01:13) Celebration of Richard Hoeg's recovery and personal experiences with mental health (1:42:59) Discussion on the Bungie lawsuit and the culture of death threats in the gaming industry (2:05:02) Richard's personal journey, coping with mistakes, and mental health discussions (2:33:12) Future collaborations, Canadian winters, and community support (2:46:22) Podcast wrap-up, future content discussion, and gratitude for community support…

Virtual Legality

1
Jury Duty | What's It Like to Decide A Murder Trial? (w/ Mrs. HoegLaw) (VL780) 58:02

1 year yang lalu58:02

58:02

In this episode, Richard Hoeg and guest Mrs. HoegLaw delve into the intricacies of jury duty, exploring the selection process, case dynamics, and decision-making. They discuss the personal implications of jury duty, courtroom challenges, and reflect on lessons learned. (0:00) Introduction and guest introduction (1:14) Mrs. Hoeg's jury duty experience and selection process (10:59) Personal implications of jury duty and courtroom dynamics (20:20) Case details, evidence, and understanding jury instructions (44:57) Jury's initial reactions, the decision-making process, and Mrs. Hoeg's role as foreperson (51:16) Impact of court's daily routine, prosecutor's behavior, and courtroom challenges (54:11) Reflections on the jury duty experience and lessons learned (57:17) Mention of Patreon and other means to support the podcast (57:46) Disclaimer on the nature of the podcast's content…

Virtual Legality

1
Real Lawyer Reads and Reacts | The US vs Apple Lawsuit (VL779) 3:32:56

1 year yang lalu3:32:56

3:32:56

In this episode, Richard Hoeg delves into the impact of Apple's restrictive platform strategies on consumers and developers. He provides an in-depth analysis of the Sherman Act and its implications, discusses the legality of Apple's walled garden model, and evaluates the Department of Justice's claims against Apple's conduct. DOCUMENTS DISCUSSED IN THIS EPISODE EARLY ARTICLES/DOJ PRESS RELEASE https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/other/apple-sued-by-biden-administration-in-landmark-case-over-iphone-monopoly/ar-BB1kijdH https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-03-21/apple-google-set-to-be-hit-by-first-probes-under-eu-digital-law https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/other/read-the-lawsuit-united-states-v-apple/ar-BB1kikAz https://www.justice.gov/opa/speech/attorney-general-merrick-b-garland-delivers-remarks-lawsuit-against-apple-monopolizing HOUSE ANTITRUST FINDINGS https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CPRT-117HPRT47832/pdf/CPRT-117HPRT47832.pdf ENFORCEMENT STANDARDS https://www.justice.gov/archives/atr/competition-and-monopoly-single-firm-conduct-under-section-2-sherman-act-chapter-1 https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-withdraws-report-antitrust-monopoly-law THE LAWSUIT https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.njd.544402/gov.uscourts.njd.544402.1.0_3.pdf APPLE RESPONSE https://www.theverge.com/2024/3/21/24107784/apples-response-to-the-dojs-iphone-antitrust-lawsuit (0:00) Introduction - A New Approach (12:49) Analysis of the impact on consumers and developers (30:25) Deep dive into the Sherman Act and its implications (46:01) The Lawsuit (1:05:02) Examination of Apple's restrictive platform strategies (1:18:40) Impact of Apple's business model on other industries (1:34:27) Legality of Apple's walled garden model (1:50:30) Evaluation of smartphone platforms and their features (2:01:07) Impact of Apple's restrictions on super apps (2:37:40) The Department of Justice's claims against Apple's conduct…

Virtual Legality

1
What is a Sweet Baby Inc? | Let's Talk About It (and Harassment) (VL778) 2:08:10

1 year yang lalu2:08:10

2:08:10

In this episode, Richard Hoeg delves into the internet drama around video games and gamergate, with a focus on the controversy surrounding Steam Curator "Sweet Baby Inc." He explores the company's role within the gaming industry, its storytelling methods, and potential legal action against them. Richard also discusses Sweet Baby Inc's involvement in Alan Wake 2 and encourages listener engagement. STEAM https://steamcommunity.com/groups/sweetbabyinc-detected/curation https://help.steampowered.com/en/faqs/view/6862-8119-C23E-EA7B https://store.steampowered.com/online_conduct?snr=100601 ___ https://store.steampowered.com/subscriber_agreement DISCORD https://discord.com/terms/ SBI https://sweetbabyinc.com/ HARASSMENT LAW https://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=9a.46.020 https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CCP§ionNum=527.6 . KOTAKU https://kotaku.com/sweet-baby-inc-consulting-games-alan-wake-2-dei-1851312428 AFTERMATH https://aftermath.site/sweet-baby-detected-conspiracy-theory-steam GUARDIAN https://www.theguardian.com/games/2024/mar/08/gamergate-trolls-woke-game-consultants OTHER ARTICLES https://www.pcgamer.com/gaming-industry/a-company-called-sweet-baby-inc-has-become-the-target-of-anti-woke-gamers-because-it-offers-consultancy-work-an-industry-standard-service-thats-been-normal-for-years/ https://www.eurogamer.net/spider-man-alan-wake-ridiculous-fishing-devs-speak-up-in-support-of-consultancy-studio-sweet-baby-inc https://www.gamedeveloper.com/business/why-are-valve-and-discord-permitting-harassment-against-sweet-baby-inc- https://www.theshortcut.com/p/sweet-baby-inc-detected-what-actually-happened TWITTER https://twitter.com/alyssa_merc https://twitter.com/marykanpie/status/1765390220940185854 https://twitter.com/HoegLaw/status/1765741352912859647 https://twitter.com/RBryant2012/status/1767271072087285783 https://twitter.com/EveilCharm/status/1767306112615763982/photo/1 https://twitter.com/kabrutusrambo/status/1764688393571569759?s=20 https://twitter.com/Lyde15/status/1767330020324991309 TAKE THIS https://www.takethis.org/2024/03/responding-to-gamergate2/ (0:00) Introduction and discussion on internet drama, video games, and gamergate (1:31) Steam Curator "Sweet Baby Inc. Detected" (6:02) Introduction to the topic of virtual legality (14:00) Controversy and allegations of Harassment (20:19) Sweet Baby Inc.'s role within the gaming industry (42:05) Sweet Baby Inc's storytelling methods (1:03:38) The role of consultancy work (1:14:08) The Sweet Baby Inc controversy (1:30:00) Encouragement for viewers to engage in discussions on these topics (1:39:58) Discussing potential legal action against Sweet Baby Inc. (2:00:27) Discussing the role of Sweet Baby Inc in Alan Wake 2 (2:06:46) Closing remarks and thanking listeners for their support…

Virtual Legality

1
Nintendo vs Yuzu | A Legal Look at Emulation and the DMCA (VL777) 2:18:08

1 year yang lalu2:18:08

2:18:08

In this episode, Richard Hoeg delves into Nintendo's lawsuit against Yuzu, discussing the intricacies of copyright laws, fair use, and game archival in the US. He examines the DMCA, the lawsuit against Tropic Haze LLC, and misconceptions about selling and fair use in copyright law. The episode also explores Yuzu's decryption process, game piracy, and its impact on Nintendo customers, along with potential outcomes of the case and the concept of equitable relief. LAWSUIT https://www.theverge.com/2024/2/27/24085075/nintendo-switch-emulator-yuzu-lawsuit LAW https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/106 https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/107 https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/117 https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/1201 https://www.copyright.gov/title37/201/37cfr201-40.html PRECEDENT https://www.copyright.gov/fair-use/summaries/sony-connectix-9thcir2000.pdf https://casetext.com/case/sony-computer-entertainment-america-v-bleem https://cdn.loc.gov/copyright/1201/2015/registers-recommendation.pdf YUZU https://yuzu-emu.org/help/quickstart/ https://www.patreon.com/yuzuteam COMMENTARY/QUESTIONS https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2024/02/how-strong-is-nintendos-legal-case-against-switch-emulator-yuzu/ https://twitter.com/moduletux/status/1762857731986256096 (0:00) Introduction: Nintendo's lawsuit against Yuzu (7:08) Copyright laws, fair use, and archival for games in the United States (14:18) The DMCA and fair use (21:20) Lawsuit against Tropic Haze LLC (39:46) Sponsor: Karen Paulson (40:17) Discussion on the bleem case, misconceptions about selling, and fair use in copyright law (48:28) Return to the lawsuit discussion: Nintendo's reputation, copyright control, and market entry decisions (1:02:48) The decryption process of Yuzu and how Yuzu emulates the Nintendo Switch (1:09:32) Game piracy and impact of piracy on Nintendo customers (1:34:20) Predicting the potential outcomes of the case, potential damages, and the concept of equitable relief (1:49:27) Thanks to the audience and transition to Q&A…

Virtual Legality

1
LAID OFF | Microsoft/Xbox Fires Almost 2000 (VL776) 59:26

2 years yang lalu59:26

59:26

In this episode, Richard Hoeg explores the Microsoft and Activision Blizzard layoffs and the role of investors. He touches on the departure of leadership personnel, the role of unions, and outsourcing customer support. Richard also delves into the state of the gaming industry, addresses listener queries, and dives into the future of game development. DISCUSSED IN THIS EPISODE HEADLINE https://www.ign.com/articles/microsoft-lays-off-1900-staff-from-its-video-game-workforce https://twitter.com/IdleSloth84_/status/1750837893881336292 TWEETS https://twitter.com/JezCorden/status/1750590022842278391 https://twitter.com/TheLyns/status/1750740015095873559 https://twitter.com/Andy_VGC/status/1750548893425676435 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS https://www.matthewball.vc/all/gaming2024 (0:00) Introduction and background (1:16) Microsoft and Activision Blizzard merger and layoffs (9:21) Role of investors and stockholders in a corporation (16:05) Departure of leadership personnel (19:19) Role of unions (24:19) Outsourcing of customer support and future of Xbox in retail (26:05) Cancellation of Blizzard's unnamed game and related layoffs (29:03) State of the gaming industry, layoffs, and the impact of generative AI (37:14) Listener queries on gaming industry trends and transition of Activision Blizzard (49:10) Future of game development, types of redundancies, and potential layoffs (57:21) The future of gaming, console preferences, and potential acquisitions (59:08) Closing remarks and disclaimers…

Virtual Legality

1
Palworld vs Pokemon | Can This Be Legal? (VL775) 1:32:11

2 years yang lalu1:32:11

1:32:11

In this episode, Richard Hoeg delves into the ethical and legal implications of Palworld's design, including a detailed analysis of its copyright controversy. He explores international copyright laws, the concept of true copies, and potential infringements. He also discusses the likelihood of Nintendo taking legal action. (0:00) Introduction (1:22) Discussion on the ethical and legal implications of Palworld's design (7:56) Response from former Pokemon company legal team member and analysis of specific design similarities (15:01) In-depth discussion on Palworld's copyright controversy (24:32) Deep dive into the foundations of international copyright laws (33:20) Examination of the concept of true copies, substantial similarity, and fair use in copyright law (41:29) Potential for legal action against Palworld and the likelihood of Nintendo taking action (49:35) Exploration of the art and gameplay of Palworld and Pokemon and their potential copyright infringement issues (57:12) Richard Hoeg's predictions on the future evolution of Palworld's game design and the influence of its success on future Pokemon games (1:07:09) Discussion on the political implications of Pal World's gameplay and comparison to other games (1:15:55) Continuation on the Nintendo and Palworld legal issues and a look at the design elements and intellectual property (1:31:03) Wrap-up, thanks to listeners, and end of episode…

Virtual Legality

1
Journalism vs The Future | Understanding the Coming AI Wars (VL774) 1:45:40

2 years yang lalu1:45:40

1:45:40

In this episode, Richard Hoeg discusses The New York Times' lawsuit against Microsoft and OpenAI, delving into copyright laws related to AI. He explores the transition of The New York Times to a digital model and legal complexities involved. Richard analyzes the challenges posed by AI models and transformative technologies, as well as the legal claims in the lawsuit. He also considers the impact on educational use of copyrighted materials and the need for fair use revision. The episode concludes with a discussion on AI-produced content ownership and its potential impacts. (0:00) Introduction and Overview: The New York Times Suing Microsoft and OpenAI (9:44) Deep Dive into Copyright Laws and AI (23:00) The Shift of The New York Times to a Digital Model (32:45) Roles of Different Companies and Legal Complexities (49:42) Challenges Posed by Generative AI Models and Transformative Technologies (1:02:23) Detailed Analysis of Legal Claims (1:14:14) Impact on Educational Uses of Copyrighted Materials and the Need for Fair Use Revision (1:29:20) OpenAI's Response to The New York Times Lawsuit and Fair Use Argument (1:33:43) Discussion on Ownership of AI-produced Content and Its Impact on Various Fields (1:44:23) Closing Remarks, Viewer Comments, and Future Plans…

Virtual Legality

1
My Stroke Story | Anniversary Special - We Start Again (VL Extra) 13:11

2 years yang lalu13:11

13:11

In this episode, Richard Hoeg and Mrs. Hoeg Law discuss stroke prevention and post-stroke anxiety. They reflect on the future, explore the perspective of co-counsel, and discuss realigning life priorities after a stroke. (0:00) Introduction (0:52) Stroke Prevention Discussion and Advice (2:29) Continuity (4:43) Post-Stroke Anxiety and Self-Doubt (6:10) Reflection on Future (7:06) Co-counsel's Perspective (10:05) Realigning Life Priorities (12:00) We Start Again…

Virtual Legality

1
Microsoft x Activision _ Under New Management (VL773) 44:15

2 years yang lalu44:15

44:15

In this episode, Richard Hoeg discusses the leadership changes following Activision's acquisition, the end of Activision Blizzard's hybrid work model for QA staff, and their settlement of a California discrimination lawsuit. He also explores Microsoft's role in the settlement and speculates about a potential new CEO at Activision. (0:00) Introduction (2:03) Leadership changes post Activision's acquisition (9:39) End of hybrid work model for QA staff at Activision Blizzard (13:20) Activision Blizzard settles California discrimination lawsuit (26:02) Discussion on the settlement of harassment claims at Activision (30:11) The role of Microsoft in the settlement and its potential impact on future changes at Activision (33:12) Question: Potential for a new CEO at Activision (38:20) Closing remarks and reflections on the past year…

Virtual Legality

1
The Best Video Games of 2023 | Hoegs Debate (THABTO) (Part 1) 1:49:04

2 years yang lalu1:49:04

1:49:04

In this episode, Richard Hoeg is joined by Tom Hoeg and Ian Runkle for a discussion on gaming highlights, Richard's recovery from a stroke, and their favorite games. They dive into "War Tales" and "Aces and Adventures," explore game concepts, and discuss Ian's experience with "Immortality." They wrap up with a VR gaming discussion and their top 10 games list. (0:00) Introduction and Welcoming Tom Hoeg (5:07) Honorable Mentions in Gaming (12:09) Richard Hoeg's Stroke Experience and Recovery (27:16) Introduction of Guest Ian Runkle and Discussion on Game Preferences (35:25) Game Opinions and Reviews: From Star Wars Jedi Survivor to Final Fantasy 16 (1:00:33) Deep Dive into "War Tales" and "Aces and Adventures" (1:08:35) Discussion on Game Concepts and Design (1:14:32) Ian's Experience with "Immortality" and Audio Cues in Games (1:20:21) Asgard's Wrath 2 and VR Gaming Discussion (1:26:19) Transition to the Top 10 Games List…

Virtual Legality

1
The Best Video Games of 2023 | Hoegs Debate (Part 2, Thanks Ian!) 1:39:42

2 years yang lalu1:39:42

1:39:42

In this episode, Richard Hoeg and Tom Hoeg discuss various video games including 'Against the Storm', 'Dead Island 2', 'Phantom Brigade', and more. They offer a defense for 'Cyberpunk 2077', delve into 'Baldur's Gate 3' and 'Starfield', and share their top games of the year. (0:00) Introduction; Return post-Runkle (6:30) 'Against the Storm' and 'Dead Island 2' (14:33) 'Phantom Brigade', 'Sea of Stars', and 'Diablo 4' (33:21) A Defense of 'Cyberpunk 2077' (39:50) 'Dave the Diver' (43:10) Discussion on 'Baldur's Gate 3' and 'Starfield' (55:06) 'The Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom' (1:06:35) Discussion on 'Remnant 2', 'Final Fantasy 16', and 'Armored Core 6' (1:25:23) Richard Hoeg's Top Game and Tom Hoeg's Top Game (1:38:04) Conclusion, Thanks to Tom Hoeg and Appreciation for the Year in Gaming…

Virtual Legality

1
EPIC WIN | Why Google Lost and What it Means For Apple (VL772) 1:19:29

2 years yang lalu1:19:29

1:19:29

In this episode, Richard Hoeg delves into the Epic Games vs. Google legal battle. He provides insights on Google's control over third parties, analyzes the jury's verdict, and explains the Sherman Act and Epic's antitrust claims. The episode also covers topics like monopolization, Google's efforts to block other app stores, their 30% fee, and the impact of antitrust laws on console platforms and semi-open systems. The future of the Apple vs Epic case and Epic's role are also discussed. (0:00) Introduction and overview: Epic Games vs. Google (6:46) Insights on Google's control over third parties and the impact on the case (14:21) Detailed analysis of the jury's verdict on Google's violations (23:04) Explanation of the Sherman Act and Epic's antitrust claims (33:25) Discussion on monopolization (43:15) Google's efforts to block other app stores (51:02) Google's 30% fee (1:03:47) Impact of antitrust laws on console platforms and semi-open systems (1:10:39) Future prospects of the Apple vs Epic case (1:15:20) Discussion on the role of Epic (1:19:03) Conclusion and Legal disclaimer…

Virtual Legality

1
Sony vs Bungie | A Not-So-Hostile Takeover? (VL771) 47:11

2 years yang lalu47:11

47:11

In this episode, Richard Hoeg delves into Sony's potential takeover of Bungie - exploring terms like "earnouts" and "dissolve", and the concept of a hostile takeover. He analyzes Bungie's performance, cost cutting measures, and the impact on morale. He also discusses the Game Awards, legal implications of layoffs, regulatory bodies in tech deals, and moral considerations. (0:00) Introduction and overview (1:15) Sony's potential takeover of Bungie: background and details (7:01) Understanding business deal terms: "earnouts" (13:14) Concept of a hostile takeover and its implications on Bungie (14:53) Analysis of Bungie's performance and the impact of cost cutting measures (20:25) The role of uncertainty in company morale and its effects (27:06) Discussion on the Game Awards (31:34) Legal and economic implications of corporate layoffs (39:19) Regulatory bodies in tech deals (45:22) Episode wrap-up…

Virtual Legality

1
A New (Old) Discovery | Sony says "You Don't Own Those!"...Again (VL770) 1:36:11

2 years yang lalu1:36:11

1:36:11

In this episode, Richard Hoeg and guest speaker, Ian Runkle, delve into the legal aspects of digital ownership, focusing on PlayStation, Sony, and Warner Brothers Discovery. They discuss Sony's legal repercussions, copyright laws, intellectual property rights, and piracy. The conversation extends to the meaning of 'purchase' in digital media, the first sales doctrine, and its impact on digital content ownership. They also look at the shift to subscription models, the limitations of NFTs, and the need for a legal upgrade for digital goods. The episode concludes with a discussion on service agreements and viewer questions. (0:00) Introduction and Briefing on the episode's focus: PlayStation, Sony, Warner Brothers Discovery, and Digital Ownership (6:03) Audience reactions and Legal repercussions for Sony regarding the Sony-Discovery issue (11:26) Deep dive into copyright laws, intellectual property rights, and Sony's distribution rights (17:09) Discussion on piracy and PlayStation Network's terms of service (24:13) Examination of PlayStation Network's terms of service and the meaning of 'purchase' in digital media (31:26) Understanding the first sales doctrine and its application to digital media (47:29) The first sale doctrine and its implications on digital content ownership (54:18) The shift from ownership to subscription models and the potential dangers of digital ownership (1:03:34) The limitations of NFTs in solving digital ownership issues and the debate on piracy (1:14:00) The need for a legal upgrade for digital goods and the power imbalances in copyright rules (1:26:40) Nuances of negotiating service agreements and addressing viewer questions (1:35:36) Closing remarks and disclaimer…

Virtual Legality

1
DISNEY'S DISCLOSURE "SURPRISE" (VL769) 55:05

2 years yang lalu55:05

55:05

In this episode, Richard Hoeg discusses the Michigan vs Ohio State game, explores Giving Tuesday and charity initiatives, and provides an overview of the channel's content. He delves into the legal obligations of publicly traded companies, specifically focusing on Disney's SEC filings, and assesses their future prospects. He also addresses listener comments, discusses brand trust, representation, diversity in media, and intellectual property ownership, and concludes with implications of Disney's "Doctor Who" distribution rights. (0:00) Introduction and episode format (1:26) Discussion on the Michigan vs Ohio State game (2:48) Giving Tuesday and charity initiatives (4:16) Overview of the channel's content and its importance (6:01) Legal obligations of publicly traded companies with a deep dive into Disney's SEC filings (14:21) Analysis of Disney's future prospects and stock trajectory (16:27) Interactions with podcast listeners and responses to their comments (24:18) Assessing Disney's efforts to rebuild brand trust and recognition (36:23) Appreciation for the support from listeners and discussion on representation and diversity in media (47:19) The portrayal of corporations in media and the need for diversity in intellectual property ownership (54:13) Implications of Disney's distribution rights to "Doctor Who" and closing remarks…

Virtual Legality

1
A Man For All (Football) Seasons? | A Legal Look at Michigan-Harbaugh vs The Big 10 (VL768) 2:35:42

2 years yang lalu2:35:42

2:35:42

In this episode, Richard Hoeg discusses the Big Ten Conference's sportsmanship policy, with special focus on Jim Harbaugh's potential innocence in the wild stallions affair. He examines the conference's letter to the University of Michigan, the legality of stealing signs during games, and Michigan's legal accountability. Richard explores the role of the Commissioner in NCAA investigations, the importance of access to underlying material in cases, and analyzes the decision made against the university. He also delves into the breach of contract allegations by the University of Michigan, exploring the concept of good faith and fair dealing in contracts. (0:00) Introduction and Welcome by Richard Hoeg (4:00) Overview of the Big Ten Conference's sportsmanship policy and its application (14:20) Jim Harbaugh's potential innocence in the wild stallions affair and standard disciplinary actions (27:28) Analysis of the Big Ten Conference's letter to the University of Michigan (37:50) Discussion on the legality of stealing signs during games and possible implications on player safety (51:39) Discussion on Michigan's legal battle and accountability (1:00:01) Examination of the role of the Commissioner in NCAA investigations and the enforcement process (1:14:22) Discussion on the access to the underlying material and its importance in the case (1:23:22) Analyzing the justification of the decision against the university (1:43:50) Final thoughts on the interpretation of the sportsmanship policy and NCAA rules (1:57:45) The consequences of the impermissible scheme for the university's football season (2:17:43) Breach of contract allegations by the University of Michigan and the concept of good faith and fair dealing in contracts (2:34:57) Sign off and reminder of the purpose of the Virtual Legality podcast…

Virtual Legality

1
Those Who Stay Will Be...Cheaters? | Scouting Michigan Football v The NCAA Rulebook (VL767 - LIVE) 53:09

2 years yang lalu53:09

53:09

In this episode, Richard Hoeg dives into the NCAA investigation into Michigan Football, examining allegations against staffer, Connor Stallions, and potential additional rule violations. The discussion extends to the "Wild Stallions Scandal" and NCAA bylaws. The episode also explores NCAA amendments, conduct rules, and ethical implications of exploiting loopholes, concluding with potential punishments for Michigan. (0:00) Introduction and background of the NCAA investigation into Michigan Football (7:00) Examination of the evidence and allegations against Michigan's staffer, Connor Stallions (12:12) Consideration of potential additional NCAA rule violations by Michigan (16:17) Introduction to the "Wild Stallions Scandal" and insight into the NCAA's role (20:27) Examination of NCAA bylaws and potential violations (25:37) Sponsor: Hoeg Law Business Law Firm (26:48) Revisions in the scouting rule and the NCAA amendments (30:24) General rules of conduct for individuals employed by or associated with member institutions (36:13) The ethical implications of exploiting gray area loopholes in NCAA rules (38:23) The potential punishment for the University of Michigan and its head coach (51:50) Concluding thoughts on the episode.…

Virtual Legality

1
Deal Closed | Lawyer Answers Your Questions On Xbox x Activision | (VL766 - LIVE) 1:33:20

2 years yang lalu1:33:20

1:33:20

In this episode, Richard Hoeg examines Microsoft's acquisition of Activision, discussing its impact on cloud gaming and the gaming industry. He explores a hypothetical scenario concerning FTC and US Congress legislation, the possible exclusion of Xbox games from streaming services, and the future of Bobby Kotick. Further, he looks at Microsoft's interest in mobile gaming, the role of King, and their strategy amidst the FTC case. He also touches on Ubisoft's potential use of Linux, concluding with audience appreciation and a disclaimer about the podcast's nature. (0:00) Introduction and recap of Microsoft's acquisition of Activision (5:05) Discussion on cloud gaming and market definition (14:21) Hypothetical on FTC and US Congress passing a law affecting Microsoft and Activision (27:56) Possibility of Xbox being excluded from offering its games on streaming services (39:11) The closing of Microsoft's acquisition of Activision and its impact on the gaming industry (44:05) The future of Bobby Kotick, CEO of Activision, post-acquisition (1:04:39) Microsoft's interest in mobile gaming and the role of King (1:13:16) Microsoft's strategy in handling integration amidst the pending FTC case (1:26:46) The potential use of Linux by Ubisoft (1:32:10) Gratitude for the audience's participation and interest in the Microsoft Times Activision topic (1:32:52) Closing remarks and disclaimer on the nature of the Virtual Legality podcast…

Virtual Legality

1
"I Declare Public Domain!" | Just How Free is 'Fables' Anyway? (VL765 - LIVE) 48:06

2 years yang lalu48:06

48:06

In this episode, Richard Hoeg discusses the comic book property "Fables" and its video game adaptation, before delving into the Copyright Act and its implications on Fables. He explores copyright and trademark law reforms, third-party involvement, potential lawsuits, and IP ownership in the comic book industry. Listener queries on Fables, business law, and IP law are addressed, followed by a discussion on comic book IP and branding. The episode concludes with listener feedback on the movie industry and copyright misunderstandings. (0:00) Introduction to the episode and discussion on unrelated topics (1:11) Discussion on the comic book property "Fables" and its video game adaptation (3:07) Q&A section and Sponsor acknowledgement (4:04) Deep dive into the Copyright Act and its implications on Fables (12:50) Radical reform of copyright and trademark laws and DC's violation of agreements (17:01) The legal implications of 3rd party involvement and compensation issues in Fables (22:11) A critique of copyright law and potential lawsuit with DC (25:46) Discussion on comic book industry contracts, IP ownership, and the case of Fables (28:48) Listener questions and comments on Fables, business law, and IP law (37:33) Discussion on comic book IP, branding, and companies holding onto their IP (44:08) Listener comments on the movie industry, copyright misunderstandings, and closing remarks…

Virtual Legality

1
Did UNITY Just BURN IT ALL DOWN? (VL 764 - LIVE) 1:03:00

2 years yang lalu1:03:00

1:03:00

In this episode, Richard Hoeg discusses the Unity game engine's business model and its impact on game developers. He analyzes Unity's new pricing plan, runtime fee, and data model for calculating installs. He also delves into the legal implications of Unity's terms of service changes and the industry's reaction to Unity's new fees. The episode closes with listener comments and legal disclaimers. (0:00) Introduction and discussion on new live format (2:05) Main topic: Unity game engine and its business model (4:23) Sponsor: Scarecrow 121 (5:28) Impact of Unity's new pricing plan and game installs fee on game developers (13:02) Shift in Unity's business model and its implications (18:08) Analysis of Unity's runtime fee and data model for calculating install numbers (25:10) Unity's terms of service changes and potential legal implications (37:01) Understanding Unity's legal standing in changing terms of service (40:36) Industry response to Unity's new fees and comparison with Epic Games (49:12) Unity's focus shift from game development to industry and its implications (1:01:10) Listener comments on the loss of trust in Unity (1:02:20) Closing remarks, support invitation, and legal disclaimers.…

Virtual Legality

1
Xbox, Activision, FTC, CMA: What Happens Next? (VL763) 53:07

2 years yang lalu53:07

53:07

In this episode, Richard Hoeg delves into the FTC vs MSABK case, with a focus on antitrust laws and relevant cases. He examines the court's burden in merger cases, the FTC's stance, and the relevance of the Brown Shoe case. The conversation continues on FTC's challenges in proving merger legality doubts, their claims of court errors, and the potential harm to consumers post-merger. The episode also covers Microsoft's response, media misinterpretations, and potential settlements with UK's CMA. (0:00) Introduction and Recap of the FTC vs MSABK case (8:03) Deep Dive into Antitrust Law and Relevant Cases (15:16) Examination of the Court's Burden in Merger Cases and FTC's Stance (18:43) Relevance of Brown Shoe Case in Establishing Antitrust Harm and Understanding Tying Contracts (24:46) Continuation on FTC's Uphill Battle in Proving Doubts about Merger's Legality (32:20) FTC's Claim on Court's Errors and Misapplications of Law (37:34) FTC's Arguments on Immediate Harm to Consumers and the Market Post-Merger (40:44) Microsoft's Response to FTC's Claims and Consequences of TRO Expiring (44:03) Media's Misinterpretation of the FTC's Appeal and Microsoft's Discussions with UK's CMA (49:20) Potential Settlement between Microsoft and CMA and Explanation of Nasdaq Indexes (52:19) Acknowledgement of Support and Closing Remarks…

Virtual Legality

1
Microsoft, Xbox, and Activision Beat FTC | Judge: Perhaps bad for Sony. But good for gamers. (VL762) 1:07:11

2 years yang lalu1:07:11

1:07:11

In this episode, Richard Hoeg delves into the recent developments in the gaming industry, focusing on the FTC's case against Microsoft's deal with Activision. He examines gaming content access, distribution models, and the legal framework, including Section 7 of the Clayton Act and antitrust laws. The discussion also covers the controversy around Microsoft's acquisition of Activision, the financial implications, and an analysis of Microsoft's post-merger actions. The episode concludes with an interpretation of US antitrust laws, UK's CMA's stance on the merger, and future content plans. (0:00) Introduction and overview of recent developments in the gaming industry (1:12) Sponsor: Melissa Latimer (2:01) Analysis of the FTC's case against Microsoft's deal with Activision (10:10) Examination of access to gaming content and distribution models (16:08) Discussion on the legal framework: Section 7 of the Clayton Act and antitrust laws (22:11) Defining the relevant market in a merger and examination of the FTC's arguments (29:05) Controversy around Microsoft's acquisition of Activision and financial implications (35:23) Analysis of Microsoft's post-merger actions and financial model (45:59) FTC's reference to Microsoft's acquisition of Zenimax and relevance to Activision deal (1:00:19) Interpretation of the US antitrust laws and their application to company mergers (1:04:45) Discussion on UK's CMA's stance on the merger following the US court's decision (1:06:05) Announcement of channel updates and future content plans…

Virtual Legality

1
"I'm a Plumber for the Brain" | Interviewing my Brain Surgeon (VL Extra) 32:07

2 years yang lalu32:07

32:07

In this episode, Richard Hoeg converses with Dr. Boyd Richards about his career in neurosurgery, brain health, impacts of smoking, and the concept of brain plasticity. They delve into the details of Richard's stroke, recovery process, and the importance of clinical research and fundraising in neurosurgery. (0:00) Introduction and Interview with Dr. Boyd Richards (1:47) Dr. Richards' Journey into Neurosurgery (6:21) Discussion on Brain Health and Impacts of Smoking (9:28) Explanation of Richard's Stroke and Medical Process (13:05) Fun and Professionalism in the Medical Field (17:05) Insights into the Daily Routine of a Surgeon and Focus during Surgery (18:08) Interesting Facts about the Brain and Plasticity Concept (20:51) Richard Hoeg's Recovery Process (24:01) Dr. Richards' Role in Neurosurgical Residency Program and Importance of Clinical Research (26:16) Importance of Fundraising for Neurosurgery Programs and Richard's Connection with Dr. Richards (29:33) Personal Updates and Social Media Presence of Dr. Richards (31:35) Closing Remarks and Disclaimer…

Selamat datang di Player FM!

Player FM memindai web untuk mencari podcast berkualitas tinggi untuk Anda nikmati saat ini. Ini adalah aplikasi podcast terbaik dan bekerja untuk Android, iPhone, dan web. Daftar untuk menyinkronkan langganan di seluruh perangkat.