Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Unedited English audio of oral arguments at the Supreme Court of Canada. Created as a public service to promote public access and awareness of the workings of Canada’s highest court. Not affiliated with or endorsed by the Court. Original archived webcasts can be found on the Court’s website at scc-csc.ca. Feedback welcome: podcast at scchearings dot ca.
…
continue reading
The latest news and analysis about key cases and critical arguments before the Supreme Court. (Updated periodically) PBS NewsHour is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders
…
continue reading
Supreme Court Season episodes will include all arguments that occur from October 01st to June/July.
…
continue reading
The Supreme Court decision syllabus, read without personal commentary. See: Wheaton and Donaldson v. Peters and Grigg, 33 U.S. 591 (1834) and United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U.S. 321, 337. Photo by: Davi Kelly. Founded by RJ Dieken. Now hosted by Jake Leahy. Frequent guest host Jeff Barnum. *Note this podcast is for informational and educational purposes only.
…
continue reading
Brett and Nazim are two attorneys who hate being attorneys. Each week, they discuss current Supreme Court cases with the intent to make the law more accessible to the average person, while ruminating on what makes the law both frustrating and interesting. This podcast is not legal advice and is for entertainment purposes only. If anything you hear leads you to believe you need legal advice, please contact an attorney immediately
…
continue reading
A chronological podcast of oral arguments with improved files and meta data. Hosted by Free Law Project through the CourtListener.com initiative. Not an official podcast.
…
continue reading
Audio from oral arguments in the Supreme Court of the United States (beg. Oct. 2010)
…
continue reading
In depth explanations of Supreme Court Cases New Jersey v T.L.O, Mapp v Ohio, and Miranda v Arizona.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
A podcast feed for the audio of Supreme Court oral arguments and decision announcements. Short case descriptions are reproduced from Oyez.org under a CC BY-NC 4.0 license. This feed is not approved, managed, or affiliated with Oyez.org. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
…
continue reading
We will dive into the astounding stories of the Supreme Court.
…
continue reading
Opinion announcements from the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
The Queens Supreme Court podcast is the hilarious spinoff of the hit online series “The Queens Supreme Court” with Ts Madison. The premise of the weekly satirical show is to discuss pop culture and all the hot social media trends, topics and gossip THEN try them as cases, render judgements and sentence the crimes accordingly to determine the ultimate fate of each celebrity!
…
continue reading
Podcast by Hemant Mehta
…
continue reading
Any listeners out there...really want entertaining basketball content? Don't want to worry about the hosts - all on the show trying to force "controversial" hot takes, all in your earbuds, yelling back and forth to win an argument? Come to The Supreme Court: A Basketball Podcast! Check back with the SC trio; Robaire, Chris, and Henri, Wednesdays as we discuss the latest NBA headlines, news, and transactions.
…
continue reading
Throughout the years the Supreme Court has evolved much like the rest of the federal government. This would not be without landmark rulings, which will be the main focus of this podcast. Landmark rulings lay the groundwork for laws to be overturned or upheld and allow for the United States to work toward major goals. Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/aaron-larson2/support
…
continue reading
This study, A Christian Response to the Supreme Court Decision, exposes the foreboding Danger that this ruling will bring upon our nation if things don’t turn around very quickly. You will also be thoroughly equipped to give a loving Biblical apologetic response to 15 different accusations made against Christians regarding this issue.
…
continue reading
1
Thornell v. Jones, No. 22-982 [Arg: 4.17.2024]
1:04:36
1:04:36
Putar nanti
Putar nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai
1:04:36
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit violated this court’s precedents by employing a flawed methodology for assessing prejudice under Strickland v. Washington when it disregarded the district court’s factual and credibility findings and excluded evidence in aggravation and the state’s rebuttal when it reversed t…
…
continue reading
1
Rudisill v. McDonough (VA Benefits)
11:15
11:15
Putar nanti
Putar nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai
11:15
Petitioner James Rudisill enlisted in the United States Army in 2000 and served a total of eight years over three separate periods of military service. He became entitled to Montgomery Bill benefits as a result of his first period of service. Rudisill earned an undergraduate degree and used 25 months and 14 days of Montgomery benefits to finance hi…
…
continue reading
A case in which the Court will clarify the methodology for assessing ineffective assistance of counsel under Strickland v. Washington.
…
continue reading
1
Supreme Court questions use of obstruction law in Jan. 6 cases
4:16
4:16
Putar nanti
Putar nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai
4:16
The Supreme Court heard arguments on Tuesday in a case looking at an obstruction law used to prosecute hundreds of Jan. 6 rioters. The obstruction statute is also key to various legal challenges facing former President Donald Trump. Geoff Bennett discussed more with Politico's Kyle Cheney, who has been following the Jan. 6 legal fallout. PBS NewsHo…
…
continue reading
1
His Majesty the King v. T.J.F. (40749)
1:05:14
1:05:14
Putar nanti
Putar nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai
1:05:14
(PUBLICATION BAN IN CASE) The respondent, T.J.F., was charged with human trafficking and obtaining a financial or material benefit from human trafficking during a period from 2006 through 2011. The trial judge accepted that the respondent had engaged in threats, intimidation and injury towards the complainant; he characterized this as “past discred…
…
continue reading
1
FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine Oral Argument
1:00:39
1:00:39
Putar nanti
Putar nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai
1:00:39
This week's episode covers the most recent abortion case before the Supreme Court, which covers less about the Constitution, and more about administrative law and the adversarial nature of the American legal system. Brett and Nazim discuss the basics underlying the case and also predict the outcome based a fairly one-sided oral argument. The law st…
…
continue reading
1
Fischer v. U.S., No. 23-5572 [Arg: 4.16.2024]
1:40:36
1:40:36
Putar nanti
Putar nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai
1:40:36
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit erred in construing 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c), which prohibits obstruction of congressional inquiries and investigations, to include acts unrelated to investigations and evidence. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★Oleh Austin Songer
…
continue reading
1
Chiaverini v. City of Napoleon, Ohio, No. 23-50 [Arg: 4.15.2024]
58:22
58:22
Putar nanti
Putar nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai
58:22
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether Fourth Amendment malicious-prosecution claims are governed by the charge-specific rule, under which a malicious prosecution claim can proceed as to a baseless criminal charge even if other charges brought alongside the baseless charge are supported by probable cause, or by the “any-crime” rule, under which probable cause…
…
continue reading
1
Snyder v. U.S., No. 23-108 [Arg: 4.15.2024]
1:38:39
1:38:39
Putar nanti
Putar nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai
1:38:39
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether section 18 U.S.C. § 666(a)(1)(B) criminalizes gratuities, i.e., payments in recognition of actions a state or local official has already taken or committed to take, without any quid pro quo agreement to take those actions. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★Oleh Austin Songer
…
continue reading
1
DeVillier v. Texas (Inverse Condemnation)
4:03
4:03
Putar nanti
Putar nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai
4:03
DEVILLIER v. TEXAS CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Argued Jan. 16, 2024—Decided Apr. 16, 2024 Richard DeVillier and more than 120 other petitioners own property north of U. S. Interstate Highway 10 between Houston and Beaumont, Texas. The dispute here arose after the State of Texas took action to use portions …
…
continue reading
Thornell v. JonesOleh Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
1
Sheetz v. El Dorado County (Takings Clause)
6:53
6:53
Putar nanti
Putar nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai
6:53
George Sheetz was required by the County of El Dorado to pay $23,420 George Sheetz tried to get a residential building permit from El Dorado County. To do so, the County made him pay a $23,420 "traffic impact fee." The fee was part of the County's "General Plan" -- this plan was intended to address the impact that development has on public services…
…
continue reading
A case in which the Court will decide whether 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c), which prohibits obstruction of congressional inquiries and investigations, includes acts unrelated to investigations and evidence.
…
continue reading
Fischer v. United StatesOleh Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
A case in which the Court will decide whether 18 U.S.C. § 666(a)(1)(B) criminalizes gratuities, i.e., payments in recognition of actions a state or local official has already taken or committed to take, without any quid pro quo agreement to take those actions.
…
continue reading
1
Macquarie Infrastructure v. Moab Partners (SEC Disclosure)
6:55
6:55
Putar nanti
Putar nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai
6:55
Macquarie Infrastructure Corporation owns a subsidiary that operates terminals to store bulk liquid commodities, including No. 6 fuel oil, which has almost 3% sulfer. The UN adopted IMO in 2016, which set in in 2020. This regulation capped the sulfur content on fuel oil used in shipping to 0.5%. Macquarie did not discuss this IMO in its public docu…
…
continue reading
1
Chiaverini v. City of Napoleon, Ohio
58:21
58:21
Putar nanti
Putar nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai
58:21
A case in which the Court will decide whether a Fourth Amendment malicious-prosecution claim can proceed as to a baseless criminal charge so long as other charges brought alongside the baseless charge are supported by probable cause.
…
continue reading
Chiaverini v. City of NapoleonOleh Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
Snyder v. United StatesOleh Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
1
Bissonnette v. LePage Bakeries (Federal Arbitration Act)
5:45
5:45
Putar nanti
Putar nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai
5:45
Flowers makes baked goods that are then distributed across the country. Bissonnette owned the distribution rights in a certain part of the country. Their contract subjected them to the F.A.A.. After Bissonnette sued under Labor (wage) laws, Flowers moved to compel arbitration. Bissonnette said they're exempt because the F.A.A. exempts “contracts of…
…
continue reading
1
Connelly v. Internal Revenue Service, No. 23-146 [Arg: 3.27.2024]
53:43
53:43
Putar nanti
Putar nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai
53:43
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the proceeds of a life-insurance policy taken out by a closely held corporation on a shareholder in order to facilitate the redemption of the shareholder’s stock should be considered a corporate asset when calculating the value of the shareholder’s shares for purposes of the federal estate tax. ★ Support this podcast on …
…
continue reading
1
Erlinger v. U.S., No. 23-370 [Arg: 3.27.2024]
1:33:07
1:33:07
Putar nanti
Putar nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai
1:33:07
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the Constitution requires a jury trial and proof beyond a reasonable doubt to find that a defendant’s prior convictions were “committed on occasions different from one another,” as is necessary to impose an enhanced sentence under the Armed Career Criminal Act. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
…
continue reading
A case in which the Court will decide whether the proceeds of a life insurance policy taken out by a closely held corporation on a shareholder in order to facilitate the redemption of the shareholder’s stock should be considered a corporate asset when calculating the value of the shareholder’s shares for purposes of the federal estate tax.…
…
continue reading
A case in which the Court will decide whether the Constitution requires a jury trial and proof beyond a reasonable doubt to find that a defendant’s prior convictions were “committed on occasions different from one another,” as is necessary to impose an enhanced sentence under the Armed Career Criminal Act.…
…
continue reading
1
Food and Drug Administration v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, No. 23-235 [Arg: 3.26.2024]
1:32:59
1:32:59
Putar nanti
Putar nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai
1:32:59
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether respondents have Article III standing to challenge the Food and Drug Administration’s 2016 and 2021 actions with respect to mifepristone’s approved conditions of use; whether the FDA’s 2016 and 2021 actions were arbitrary and capricious; and whether the district court properly granted preliminary relief. ★ Support this p…
…
continue reading
Erlinger v. United StatesOleh Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
Connelly v. United StatesOleh Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
1
Reproductive rights before Supreme Court again with abortion pill access at stake
6:44
6:44
Putar nanti
Putar nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai
6:44
The Supreme Court heard arguments in a major case that could further limit when and how women in America can get an abortion. The case centers on access to the most widely used abortion pill mifepristone. It's the latest in the ongoing legal battle over reproductive rights. William Brangham discussed the arguments with NewsHour Supreme Court analys…
…
continue reading
1
Braydon Wolfe v. His Majesty the King (40558)
1:55:25
1:55:25
Putar nanti
Putar nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai
1:55:25
After consuming alcohol, Mr. Wolfe drove his vehicle on the wrong side of a divided highway for a considerable distance at night. He caused a head-on collision that seriously injured Mrs. Niazi and killed her husband and daughter. Mr. Wolfe was convicted on two counts of criminally negligent operation of a motor vehicle causing death under s. 220(b…
…
continue reading
1
International Air Transport Association, et al. v. Canadian Transportation Agency, et al. (40614)
2:29:34
2:29:34
Putar nanti
Putar nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai
2:29:34
This case involves a challenge to the validity of regulations adopted by the Agency to compensate air passengers for various delays, losses and inconveniences experienced in the course of international air travel. Parliament adopted the Transportation Modernization Act, S.C. 2018, c. 10 (“TMA”), which amended the CTA by creating the new s. 86.11. T…
…
continue reading
1
Food and Drug Administration v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine
1:32:58
1:32:58
Putar nanti
Putar nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai
1:32:58
A case in which the Court will resolve a challenge to the Food and Drug Administration’s 2016 and 2021 approval of the abortion drug mifepristone.
…
continue reading
1
FDA v. Alliance Hippocratic Medicine
1:19:50
1:19:50
Putar nanti
Putar nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai
1:19:50
FDA v. Alliance Hippocratic MedicineOleh Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
1
Future of abortion pill mifepristone will be decided by Supreme Court
7:49
7:49
Putar nanti
Putar nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai
7:49
The U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments Tuesday over whether to restrict access to mifepristone, one of two drugs used in medication abortions. The case will be the first the court has heard on abortion since it overturned Roe v. Wade. Special Correspondent Sarah Varney reports on what's at stake. PBS NewsHour is supported by - https://www.pbs.o…
…
continue reading
1
Stephen Breyer on new book 'Reading the Constitution' and debate over how to interpret it
10:31
10:31
Putar nanti
Putar nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai
10:31
For as long as America has had a constitution, there's been debate over how to interpret it. That's particularly true when it comes to hot-button Supreme Court cases. For nearly 30 years, Stephen Breyer served on the nation's highest court, deciding on cases with ramifications still being felt across the country today. Amna Nawaz spoke with Breyer …
…
continue reading
1
Harrow v. Department of Defense, No. 23-21 [Arg: 3.25.2024]
50:40
50:40
Putar nanti
Putar nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai
50:40
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the 60-day deadline in 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(1)(A) for a federal employee to petition the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit to review a final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board is jurisdictional. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★Oleh Austin Songer
…
continue reading
1
Becerra v. San Carlos Apache Tribe, No. 23-250 [Arg: 3.25.2024]
1:26:29
1:26:29
Putar nanti
Putar nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai
1:26:29
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the Indian Health Service must pay “contract support costs” not only to support IHS-funded activities, but also to support the tribe’s expenditure of income collected from third parties. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★Oleh Austin Songer
…
continue reading
A case in which the Court will decide whether the 60-day filing deadline in 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(1)(A) is jurisdictional.
…
continue reading
1
Becerra v. San Carlos Apache Tribe
1:26:28
1:26:28
Putar nanti
Putar nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai
1:26:28
A case in which the Court will decide whether the Indian Health Service must pay “contract support costs” not only to support IHS-funded activities, but also to support the tribe’s expenditure of income collected from third parties.
…
continue reading
Harrow v. Dept. of DefenseOleh Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
1
Becerra, Sec. of H&HS v. San Carlos Apache Tribe
1:14:15
1:14:15
Putar nanti
Putar nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai
1:14:15
Becerra, Sec. of H&HS v. San Carlos Apache TribeOleh Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
1
Why 2024 may be the most consequential election for reproductive rights in 50 years
6:35
6:35
Putar nanti
Putar nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai
6:35
The Supreme Court will hear arguments on Tuesday in a case challenging FDA rules that make it easier to get mifepristone, the medication that accounts for more than half of all U.S. abortions. John Yang speaks with legal historian Mary Ziegler about the role executive branch agencies can play in a post-Roe world and the potential consequences of th…
…
continue reading
1
Texas v. New Mexico and Colorado, No. 22O141 [Arg: 3.20.2024]
1:08:41
1:08:41
Putar nanti
Putar nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai
1:08:41
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the court should deny the motion by Texas, New Mexico, and Colorado for entry of a proposed consent decree that would resolve this dispute over the United States' claim as intervenors that New Mexico violated the Rio Grande Compact without the United States’ consent. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
…
continue reading
1
Gonzalez v. Trevino, No. 22-1025 [Arg: 3.20.2024]
1:25:45
1:25:45
Putar nanti
Putar nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai
1:25:45
QUESTION PRESENTED: (1) Whether the probable-cause exception in Nieves v. Barlett can be satisfied by objective evidence other than specific examples of arrests that never happened; and (2) whether Nieves is limited to individual claims against arresting officers for split-second arrests. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
…
continue reading
1
Truck Insurance Exchange v. Kaiser Gypsum Company, No. 22-1079 [Arg: 3.19.2024]
1:12:12
1:12:12
Putar nanti
Putar nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai
1:12:12
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether an insurer with financial responsibility for a bankruptcy claim is a “party in interest” that may object to a plan of reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★Oleh Austin Songer
…
continue reading