NCLA Digs Deeper Into SCOTUS Victory in Garland v. Cargill and the Definition of a "machinegun"

Administrative Static Podcast

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled 6-3 in the NCLA case of Garland v. Cargill that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives’ unilateral bump-stock ban conflicts with the federal statute defining “machineguns.”

ATF’s regulatory ban, which the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit shot down early last year, reversed the agency’s own long-standing recognition that bump-stock-equipped firearms are not machine guns.

NCLA commends the high court for permanently setting ATF’s ban aside, safeguarding the rights of our client Michael Cargill and hundreds of thousands of other Americans to be free from laws written by executive branch bureaucrats instead of elected members of Congress.

Mark, John, and Jenin celebrate this victory and dive into the case and the meaning of "machineguns" in this latest episode.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.