Artwork

Konten disediakan oleh J. Paul Neeley. Semua konten podcast termasuk episode, grafik, dan deskripsi podcast diunggah dan disediakan langsung oleh J. Paul Neeley atau mitra platform podcast mereka. Jika Anda yakin seseorang menggunakan karya berhak cipta Anda tanpa izin, Anda dapat mengikuti proses yang diuraikan di sini https://id.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Aplikasi Podcast
Offline dengan aplikasi Player FM !

Dyadic Morality with Kurt Gray

43:20
 
Bagikan
 

Manage episode 285196329 series 2827257
Konten disediakan oleh J. Paul Neeley. Semua konten podcast termasuk episode, grafik, dan deskripsi podcast diunggah dan disediakan langsung oleh J. Paul Neeley atau mitra platform podcast mereka. Jika Anda yakin seseorang menggunakan karya berhak cipta Anda tanpa izin, Anda dapat mengikuti proses yang diuraikan di sini https://id.player.fm/legal.
“Dyadic morality is ultimately about the link between perceived harm and immorality…”

Why do we believe murder is “wrong”? Why can’t we compare the effects of a hurricane with the acts of a paedophile? Kurt Gray argues that human morality stems from “harm” - that moral acts have an intentional agent and a victim, and it is this perception of harm caused by one person to another that allows us to define moral evils.

So could this explain political differences? Do we just all have different definitions of harm? In which case, is there a way of reconciling polarised groups by re-examining our own perception of harm and suffering?

“I think one way forward is acknowledging that the other side’s perceptions of harm are legitimate…”

Listen to Kurt and Turi discuss how harm is the basis of human morality.

  • How intuitionism is actually about harm
  • Whether morality requires a perpetrator and a victim
  • How dyadic moral theory deals with self-harm
  • Why people moralise homosexuality
  • The importance of theory of mind in dyadic morality
  • God versus Environment
  • The moral differences between Liberals and Conservatives
  • How people remove moral harm
  • Why perceptions of harm creates political polarisation
  • Whether recognition of perceptions of harm can bridge the political divide
“The way to see people as more moral is to acknowledge that their perceptions of harm are not made up, but instead authentic and that they really are worried about safeguarding others from suffering…”

Works cited include:

Kurt Gray

Dr. Gray is an Associate Professor in Psychology and Neuroscience at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, where he directs the Deepest Beliefs Lab and the Center for the Science of Moral Understanding. He is also an Adjunct Associate Professor in Organizational Behavior at the Kenan-Flagler Business School at UNC, where he teaches about organizational ethics and team processes.


More on this episode

Learn all about the Parlia Podcast here.

Meet Turi Munthe: https://www.parlia.com/u/Turi

Learn more about the Parlia project here: https://www.parlia.com/about

And visit us at: https://www.parlia.com



Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

  continue reading

45 episode

Artwork
iconBagikan
 
Manage episode 285196329 series 2827257
Konten disediakan oleh J. Paul Neeley. Semua konten podcast termasuk episode, grafik, dan deskripsi podcast diunggah dan disediakan langsung oleh J. Paul Neeley atau mitra platform podcast mereka. Jika Anda yakin seseorang menggunakan karya berhak cipta Anda tanpa izin, Anda dapat mengikuti proses yang diuraikan di sini https://id.player.fm/legal.
“Dyadic morality is ultimately about the link between perceived harm and immorality…”

Why do we believe murder is “wrong”? Why can’t we compare the effects of a hurricane with the acts of a paedophile? Kurt Gray argues that human morality stems from “harm” - that moral acts have an intentional agent and a victim, and it is this perception of harm caused by one person to another that allows us to define moral evils.

So could this explain political differences? Do we just all have different definitions of harm? In which case, is there a way of reconciling polarised groups by re-examining our own perception of harm and suffering?

“I think one way forward is acknowledging that the other side’s perceptions of harm are legitimate…”

Listen to Kurt and Turi discuss how harm is the basis of human morality.

  • How intuitionism is actually about harm
  • Whether morality requires a perpetrator and a victim
  • How dyadic moral theory deals with self-harm
  • Why people moralise homosexuality
  • The importance of theory of mind in dyadic morality
  • God versus Environment
  • The moral differences between Liberals and Conservatives
  • How people remove moral harm
  • Why perceptions of harm creates political polarisation
  • Whether recognition of perceptions of harm can bridge the political divide
“The way to see people as more moral is to acknowledge that their perceptions of harm are not made up, but instead authentic and that they really are worried about safeguarding others from suffering…”

Works cited include:

Kurt Gray

Dr. Gray is an Associate Professor in Psychology and Neuroscience at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, where he directs the Deepest Beliefs Lab and the Center for the Science of Moral Understanding. He is also an Adjunct Associate Professor in Organizational Behavior at the Kenan-Flagler Business School at UNC, where he teaches about organizational ethics and team processes.


More on this episode

Learn all about the Parlia Podcast here.

Meet Turi Munthe: https://www.parlia.com/u/Turi

Learn more about the Parlia project here: https://www.parlia.com/about

And visit us at: https://www.parlia.com



Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

  continue reading

45 episode

Alle Folgen

×
 
Loading …

Selamat datang di Player FM!

Player FM memindai web untuk mencari podcast berkualitas tinggi untuk Anda nikmati saat ini. Ini adalah aplikasi podcast terbaik dan bekerja untuk Android, iPhone, dan web. Daftar untuk menyinkronkan langganan di seluruh perangkat.

 

Panduan Referensi Cepat