))
Analysis: Supreme Court ruling on domestic abusers and gun rights
Seri yang sudah diarsipkan ("Feed tidak aktif" status)
When?
This feed was archived on September 26, 2024 06:05 (
Why? Feed tidak aktif status. Server kami tidak mendapatkan feed podcast yang valid secara terus-menerus.
What now? You might be able to find a more up-to-date version using the search function. This series will no longer be checked for updates. If you believe this to be in error, please check if the publisher's feed link below is valid and contact support to request the feed be restored or if you have any other concerns about this.
Manage episode 426828794 series 3583945
Konten disediakan oleh Duke Law Media. Semua konten podcast termasuk episode, grafik, dan deskripsi podcast diunggah dan disediakan langsung oleh Duke Law Media atau mitra platform podcast mereka. Jika Anda yakin seseorang menggunakan karya berhak cipta Anda tanpa izin, Anda dapat mengikuti proses yang diuraikan di sini https://id.player.fm/legal.
Last week, the Supreme Court ruled 8-1 in favor of upholding a 1994 ban on persons with restraining orders having access to firearms. While the outcome in U.S. v. Rahimi wasn’t entirely unexpected, it did offer our first glimpse into how the conservative-majority Court would handle gun rights cases going forward.
The views of the host and guests of the Duke Law Podcast do not necessarily reflect those of Duke Law School.
5 episode
Bagikan
