libertarianism vs. libertinism, progressivism and egalitarianism

The Gracious Fundamentalist

P.S. I made an error with the name of the Murray Rothbard Essay in my recording. It was actually called, "Egalitarianism A Revolt Against Nature."

*****Transcript****

"In this follow up to my defense of Christian libertarianism I wish to further separate libertarianism from libertine and socially progressive ideologies. Libertarianism is too often associated with the Libertarian Party with a capital L. This form of Libertarianism is Pro Choice and Socially Liberal. However, that is not the origin of the political philosophy of libertarianism as a philosophy. The origins is in the far or even extreme Old Right and libertarianism as a lowercase philosophy has always been a right wing/anti egalitarian movement.

Historically there is no need to associate libertarianism with libertine values or socially progressive/egalitarian views. The philosophical bulk work which included people like Ludwig Von Mises, Murray Rothbard, Walter Block, and the most controversial of them all Professor Hans-Hermann Hoppe. Of course one of the most well known lowercase libertarians of recent times has been Ron Paul. Whom was/is pro Closed Borders, Anti Faux Same Sex Unions and staunchly Pro Life; he even ran on building a Wall on the border long before Trump ran on the same promise. He even is in favor of localized Traditional Marriage only legislation.

It was Dr. No or Dr. Ron Paul whom first introduced me to the libertarian viewpoint in politics and not The Libertarian Party. I owned his Ron Paul Revolution book and was pointed to places like the Mises Institute for further learning. I was never once pointed to an uppercase Libertarian Party affiliated compromiser of the true libertarian philosophy.

Libertarianism talks about the use of State imitation of coercion and was historically lead by people with essays like, "Egalitarianism a Revolt Against Nature." (Rothbard's amazing essay against the gay and women’s liberation movements.)

People whom were socially very traditionalist and conservative not liberal. I am against pretty much everything that is labelled liberal or socially progressive. I do not want to have my local communities filled with immoral degeneracy like practicing homosexuals sashaying their Pride in my streets. Drag Queen Story hours are Child Abuse. Marriage was created by God and should be defended still as Traditional (true) Marriage.

What I disagree with is that we need to use a centralized States force to make any of that happen nor should we strive to use it to do so. All these things should be happening via the most decentralized system possible. At the most local level and built around communities of like minded individuals. This means I would be fine with local legislation against numerous things at the most local and decentralized level, and done by people banning together in common cause against the storm of Ungodly filth being thrown at us by the Unbelieving World.

What needs to be limited is centralization and the initiation of coercion associated with this centralized Statist worldview. I am willing to let the most extreme theonomist whom wants to bring back Capital Punishment for sexual immorality have their own communities where they do just that. As long as everyone moving into said communities know the laws in their area are based in the Mosaic Laws of the dispensation of law and consented to these rules. I would never live there myself and I would not ever support such legislation in my own community, but, I also would not want the Federal or Municipal Government of another community to use force to stop them from having said community.

People should be able to live in communities where they can live out their beliefs in the rules around them. From the most Extreme Biblical Law proponent to the moderates to the old school classical liberal. However, they have no right to Force Us to have to live in communities that do not conform to Christian/Biblical Values. The answer is to; while States exist; to push for decentralization, States or Locality Rights. Where locality rights are not able to be found The States only function is the protection of life, liberty and property nothing more.

It should not be used to force people together whom wish to dissociate from each other nor should State force be used to force people apart that which to associate together voluntarily in mutual cooperation. Voluntary mutual consensual cooperation between individuals and groups of individuals is the key to true libertarianism and not pushing socially progressive and liberal values on those whom do not agree with them."