10.24.2024 -- NLS -- "The Ranked Choice Voting Trap: A Recipe for Election Chaos?"

The Neal Larson Show

Send us a text

On this episode with Neal and Julie, they delve into the complex topic of ranked choice voting (RCV), focusing on its potential impact on elections. Neal discusses a viral social media post that uses a food analogy to explain the process, but he quickly shifts the conversation to the fundamental flaws he sees in RCV. He argues that traditional voting methods, such as the boarda method, more accurately reflect voter preferences without distorting the results.

Julie adds that the goal of RCV proponents, particularly in the context of Prop 1, is to sway elections in favor of liberal candidates who might not succeed in a binary system. Neal expresses concern that RCV complicates the process unnecessarily, making it harder for voters to understand and making it more difficult for candidates to clearly distinguish themselves. Julie then compares the system to professional sports teams, noting how it would be absurd for fans of one team to select players for their rivals—a metaphor illustrating how RCV takes control away from voters.

They discuss the importance of giving candidates a period to campaign against a single opponent, which RCV undermines by forcing voters to juggle multiple choices. The conversation also touches on the broader implications of RCV for both local and national elections, including the possibility of civil unrest depending on the outcomes. Neal emphasizes the need for traditional voting methods to avoid such complications and to ensure the electorate’s voice is truly heard.

Finally, Neal and Julie urge listeners to remain engaged, suggesting that getting people out to vote on Election Day is far more powerful than simply placing a sign in your yard.