Player FM - Internet Radio Done Right
32 subscribers
Checked 26d ago
Menambahkan five tahun yang lalu
Konten disediakan oleh Better Informed Network. Semua konten podcast termasuk episode, grafik, dan deskripsi podcast diunggah dan disediakan langsung oleh Better Informed Network atau mitra platform podcast mereka. Jika Anda yakin seseorang menggunakan karya berhak cipta Anda tanpa izin, Anda dapat mengikuti proses yang diuraikan di sini https://id.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Aplikasi Podcast
Offline dengan aplikasi Player FM !
Offline dengan aplikasi Player FM !
Podcast Layak Disimak
DISPONSORI
Y
You Can’t Make This Up
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3646b/3646bb7ee2d8d9c2adc9564784e14f942a292ad1" alt="You Can’t Make This Up podcast artwork"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/38a7e/38a7e47f88634426fae46a3b4cf019437b974f7f" alt="You Can’t Make This Up podcast artwork"
At the dawn of the social media era, Belle Gibson became a pioneering wellness influencer - telling the world how she beat cancer with an alternative diet. Her bestselling cookbook and online app provided her success, respect, and a connection to the cancer-battling influencer she admired the most. But a curious journalist with a sick wife began asking questions that even those closest to Belle began to wonder. Was the online star faking her cancer and fooling the world? Kaitlyn Dever stars in the Netflix hit series Apple Cider Vinegar . Inspired by true events, the dramatized story follows Belle’s journey from self-styled wellness thought leader to disgraced con artist. It also explores themes of hope and acceptance - and how far we’ll go to maintain it. In this episode of You Can't Make This Up, host Rebecca Lavoie interviews executive producer Samantha Strauss. SPOILER ALERT! If you haven't watched Apple Cider Vinegar yet, make sure to add it to your watch-list before listening on. Listen to more from Netflix Podcasts .…
Advocate Christ Medical Center v. Becerra, No. 23-715 [Arg: 11.5.2024]
Manage episode 450821261 series 2558408
Konten disediakan oleh Better Informed Network. Semua konten podcast termasuk episode, grafik, dan deskripsi podcast diunggah dan disediakan langsung oleh Better Informed Network atau mitra platform podcast mereka. Jika Anda yakin seseorang menggunakan karya berhak cipta Anda tanpa izin, Anda dapat mengikuti proses yang diuraikan di sini https://id.player.fm/legal.
QUESTION PRESENTED:
- Whether the phrase “entitled ... to benefits,” used twice in the same sentence of the Medicare Act, means the same thing for Medicare part A and Supplemental Social Security benefits, such that it includes all who meet basic program eligibility criteria, whether or not benefits are actually received.
341 episode
Manage episode 450821261 series 2558408
Konten disediakan oleh Better Informed Network. Semua konten podcast termasuk episode, grafik, dan deskripsi podcast diunggah dan disediakan langsung oleh Better Informed Network atau mitra platform podcast mereka. Jika Anda yakin seseorang menggunakan karya berhak cipta Anda tanpa izin, Anda dapat mengikuti proses yang diuraikan di sini https://id.player.fm/legal.
QUESTION PRESENTED:
- Whether the phrase “entitled ... to benefits,” used twice in the same sentence of the Medicare Act, means the same thing for Medicare part A and Supplemental Social Security benefits, such that it includes all who meet basic program eligibility criteria, whether or not benefits are actually received.
341 episode
Semua episode
×data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Cunningham v. Cornell University, No. 23-1007 [Arg: 1.22.2025] 1:30:44
1:30:44
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:30:44data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether a plaintiff can state a claim by alleging that a plan fiduciary engaged in a transaction constituting a furnishing of goods, services, or facilities between the plan and a party in interest, as proscribed by 29 U.S.C. § 1106(a)(1)(C) , or whether a plaintiff must plead and prove additional elements and facts not contained in the provision’s text. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Barnes v. Felix, No. 23-1239 [Arg: 1.22.2025] 1:15:57
1:15:57
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:15:57data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether courts should apply the "moment of the threat" doctrine when evaluating an excessive force claim under the Fourth Amendment. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates v. McKesson Corporation, No. 23-1226 [Arg: 1.21.2025] 1:13:53
1:13:53
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:13:53data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the Hobbs Act required the district court in this case to accept the Federal Communications Commission’s legal interpretation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act . ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Food and Drug Administration v. R.J. Reynolds Vapor Co., No. 23-1187 [Arg: 1.21.2025] 1:12:12
1:12:12
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:12:12data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether a manufacturer may file a petition for review in a circuit (other than the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit) where it neither resides nor has its principal place of business, if the petition is joined by a seller of the manufacturer’s products that is located within that circuit. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, No. 23-1122 [Arg: 1.15.2025] 2:05:32
2:05:32
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai2:05:32data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the court of appeals erred as a matter of law in applying rational-basis review, instead of strict scrutiny, to a law burdening adults’ access to protected speech. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Waetzig v. Halliburton Energy Services, No. 23-971 [Arg: 1.14.2025] 49:01
49:01
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai49:01data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether a voluntary dismissal without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 is a “final judgment, order, or proceeding” under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) . ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Thompson v. U.S., No. 23-1095 [Arg: 1.14.2025] 1:17:03
1:17:03
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:17:03data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether 18 U.S.C. § 1014 , which prohibits making a “false statement” for the purpose of influencing certain financial institutions and federal agencies, also prohibits making a statement that is misleading but not false. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Stanley v. City of Sanford, Florida, No. 23-997 [Arg: 1.13.2025] 1:18:04
1:18:04
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:18:04data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether, under the Americans with Disabilities Act , a former employee — who was qualified to perform her job and who earned post-employment benefits while employed — loses her right to sue over discrimination with respect to those benefits solely because she no longer holds her job. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Hewitt v. U.S., No. 23-1002 [Arg: 1.13.2025] 1:30:43
1:30:43
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:30:43data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the First Step Act ’s sentencing reduction provisions apply to a defendant originally sentenced before the act’s enactment, when that original sentence is judicially vacated and the defendant is resentenced to a new term of imprisonment after the act’s enactment. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 TikTok v. Garland, No. 24-656 [Arg: 1.10.2025] 2:28:50
2:28:50
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai2:28:50data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: - Whether the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act , as applied to petitioners, violates the First Amendment. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Dewberry Group v. Dewberry Engineers, No. 23-900 [Arg: 12.11.2024] 1:10:58
1:10:58
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:10:58data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether an award of the “defendant’s profits” under the Lanham Act can include an order for the defendant to disgorge the distinct profits of legally separate non-party corporate affiliates. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County, Colorado, No. 23-975 [Arg: 12.10.2024] 1:50:37
1:50:37
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:50:37data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the National Environmental Policy Act requires an agency to study environmental impacts beyond the proximate effects of the action over which the agency has regulatory authority. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Feliciano v. Department of Transportation, No. 23-861 [Arg: 12.9.2024] 1:13:34
1:13:34
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:13:34data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether a federal civilian employee called or ordered to active duty under a provision of law during a national emergency is entitled to differential pay even if the duty is not directly connected to the national emergency. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Kousisis v. U.S., No. 23-909 [Arg: 12.9.2024] 1:26:52
1:26:52
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:26:52data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether deception to induce a commercial exchange can constitute mail or wire fraud, even if inflicting economic harm on the alleged victim was not the object of the scheme; whether a sovereign’s statutory, regulatory, or policy interest is a property interest when compliance is a material term of payment for goods or services; and whether all contract rights are “property.” ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 U.S. v. Skrmetti, No. 23-477 [Arg: 12.4.2024] 2:21:11
2:21:11
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai2:21:11data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: - Whether Tennessee Senate Bill 1 , which prohibits all medical treatments intended to allow “a minor to identify with, or live as, a purported identity inconsistent with the minor’s sex” or to treat “purported discomfort or distress from a discordance between the minor’s sex and asserted identity,” violates the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Republic of Hungary v. Simon, No. 23-867 [Arg: 12.3.2024] 1:24:02
1:24:02
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:24:02data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether historical commingling of assets suffices to establish that proceeds of seized property have a commercial nexus with the United States under the expropriation exception to the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act ; whether a plaintiff must make out a valid claim that an exception to the FSIA applies at the pleading stage, rather than merely raising a plausible inference; and whether a sovereign defendant bears the burden of producing evidence to affirmatively disprove that the proceeds of property taken in violation of international law have a commercial nexus with the United States under the expropriation exception to the FSIA. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 U.S. v. Miller, No. 23-824 [Arg: 12.2.2024] 53:38
53:38
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai53:38data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether a bankruptcy trustee may avoid a debtor’s tax payment to the United States under 11 U.S.C. § 544(b) when no actual creditor could have obtained relief under the applicable state fraudulent-transfer law outside of bankruptcy. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Food and Drug Administration v. Wages and White Lion Investments, LLC, No. 23-1038 [Arg: 12.2.2024] 1:20:05
1:20:05
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:20:05data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the court of appeals erred in setting aside the Food and Drug Administration’s orders denying respondents’ applications for authorization to market new e-cigarette products as arbitrary and capricious. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 NVIDIA Corp. v. E. Ohman J:or Fonder AB, No. 23-970 [Arg: 11.13.2024] 1:27:13
1:27:13
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:27:13data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: (1) Whether plaintiffs seeking to allege scienter under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act based on allegations about internal company documents must plead with particularity the contents of those documents; and (2) whether plaintiffs can satisfy the Act's falsity requirement by relying on an expert opinion to substitute for particularized allegations of fact. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Delligatti v. U.S., No. 23-825 [Arg: 11.12.2024] 1:03:13
1:03:13
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:03:13data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether a crime that requires proof of bodily injury or death, but can be committed by failing to take action, has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Velazquez v. Garland, No. 23-929 [Arg: 11.12.2024] 1:07:14
1:07:14
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:07:14data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether, when a noncitizen's voluntary-departure period ends on a weekend or public holiday, a motion to reopen filed the next business day is sufficient to avoid the penalties for failure to depart under 8 U.S.C. § 1229c(d)(1) . ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Facebook v. Amalgamated Bank, No. 23-980 [Arg: 11.6.2024] 1:43:36
1:43:36
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:43:36data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether risk disclosures are false or misleading when they do not disclose that a risk has materialized in the past, even if that past event presents no known risk of ongoing or future business harm. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 E.M.D. Sales v. Carrera, No. 23-217 [Arg: 11.5.2024] 42:10
42:10
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai42:10data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the burden of proof that employers must satisfy to demonstrate the applicability of a Fair Labor Standards Act exemption is a mere preponderance of the evidence or clear and convincing evidence. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Advocate Christ Medical Center v. Becerra, No. 23-715 [Arg: 11.5.2024] 1:10:28
1:10:28
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:10:28data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the phrase “entitled ... to benefits,” used twice in the same sentence of the Medicare Act , means the same thing for Medicare part A and Supplemental Social Security benefits, such that it includes all who meet basic program eligibility criteria, whether or not benefits are actually received. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Wisconsin Bell v. U.S., ex rel. Todd Heath, No. 23-1127 [Arg: 11.4.2024] 1:33:56
1:33:56
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:33:56data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether reimbursement requests submitted to the Federal Communications Commission's E-rate program are “claims” under the False Claims Act . ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Bufkin v. McDonough, No. 23-713 [Arg: 10.16.2024] 1:12:45
1:12:45
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:12:45data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims must ensure that the benefit-of-the-doubt rule in 38 U.S.C. § 5107(b) was properly applied during the claims process in order to satisfy 38 U.S.C. § 7261(b)(1) , which directs the court to “take due account” of the Department of Veterans Affairs’ application of that rule. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 City and County of San Francisco v. Environmental Protection Agency, No. 23-753 [Arg: 10.16.2024] 1:37:34
1:37:34
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:37:34data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the Clean Water Act allows the Environmental Protection Agency (or an authorized state) to impose generic prohibitions in National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permits that subject permit-holders to enforcement for violating water quality standards without identifying specific limits to which their discharges must conform. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Medical Marijuana v. Horn, No. 23-365 [Arg: 10.15.2024] 1:08:18
1:08:18
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:08:18data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether economic harms resulting from personal injuries are injuries to “business or property by reason of” the defendant’s acts for purposes of a civil treble-damages action under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act . ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Bouarfa v. Mayorkas, No. 23-583 [Arg: 10.15.2024] 49:20
49:20
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai49:20data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether a visa petitioner may obtain judicial review when an approved petition is revoked on the basis of nondiscretionary criteria. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Glossip v. Oklahoma, No. 22-7466 [Arg: 10.9.2024] 1:43:02
1:43:02
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:43:02data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: (1) Whether the state’s suppression of the key prosecution witness’ admission that he was under the care of a psychiatrist and failure to correct that witness’ false testimony about that care and related diagnosis violate the due process of law under Brady v. Maryland and Napue v. Illinois ; (2) whether the entirety of the suppressed evidence must be considered when assessing the materiality of Brady and Napue claims; (3) whether due process of law requires reversal where a capital conviction is so infected with errors that the state no longer seeks to defend it; and (4) whether the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals' holding that the Oklahoma Post-Conviction Procedure Act precluded post-conviction relief is an adequate and independent state-law ground for the judgment. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Lackey v. Stinnie, No. 23-621 [Arg: 10.8.2024] 1:17:55
1:17:55
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:17:55data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: (1) Whether a party must obtain a ruling that conclusively decides the merits in its favor, as opposed to merely predicting a likelihood of later success, to prevail on the merits under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 ; and (2) whether a party must obtain an enduring change in the parties’ legal relationship from a judicial act, as opposed to a non-judicial event that moots the case, to prevail under Section 1988. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Garland v. VanDerStok, No. 23-852 [Arg: 10.8.2024] 1:16:08
1:16:08
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:16:08data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: (1) Whether “a weapon parts kit that is designed to or may readily be completed, assembled, restored, or otherwise converted to expel a projectile by the action of an explosive” under 27 C.F.R. § 478.11 is a “firearm” regulated by the Gun Control Act of 1968 ; and (2) whether “a partially complete, disassembled, or nonfunctional frame or receiver” that is “designed to or may readily be completed, assembled, restored, or otherwise converted to function as a frame or receiver” under 27 C.F.R. § 478.12(c) is a “frame or receiver” regulated by the act. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Williams v. Washington, No. 23-191 [Arg: 10.7.2024] 1:15:51
1:15:51
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:15:51data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether exhaustion of state administrative remedies is required to bring claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in state court. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Royal Canin U.S.A. v. Wullschleger, No. 23-677 [Arg: 10.7.2024] 1:05:22
1:05:22
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:05:22data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: (1) Whether a post-removal amendment of a complaint to omit federal questions defeats federal-question subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ; and (2) whether such a post-removal amendment of a complaint precludes a district court from exercising supplemental jurisdiction over the plaintiff’s remaining state-law claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367 . ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Trump v. U.S., No. 23-939 [Arg: 4.25.2024] 2:39:18
2:39:18
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai2:39:18data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether and if so to what extent does a former president enjoy presidential immunity from criminal prosecution for conduct alleged to involve official acts during his tenure in office. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Moyle v. U.S., No. 23-726 [Arg: 4.24.2024] 1:53:01
1:53:01
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:53:01data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the Supreme Court should stay the order by the U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho enjoining the enforcement of Idaho’s Defense of Life Act, which prohibits abortions unless necessary to save the life of the mother, on the ground that the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act preempts it. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Starbucks Corp. v. McKinney, No. 23-367 [Arg: 4.23.2024] 52:18
52:18
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai52:18data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether courts must evaluate the National Labor Relations Board’s requests for injunctions under Section 10(j) of the National Labor Relations Act using the traditional, stringent, four-factor test for preliminary injunctions or some other more lenient standard. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Department of State v. Muñoz, No. 23-334 [Arg: 4.23.2024] 1:31:26
1:31:26
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:31:26data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether a consular officer's refusal of a visa to a U.S. citizen's noncitizen spouse impinges upon a constitutionally protected interest of the citizen; and whether, assuming that such a constitutional interest exists, notifying a visa applicant that he was deemed inadmissible under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a) (A)(ii) suffices to provide any process that is due. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Smith v. Spizzirri, No. 22-1218 [Arg: 4.22.2024] 43:17
43:17
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai43:17data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether Section 3 of the Federal Arbitration Act requires district courts to stay a lawsuit pending arbitration, or whether district courts have discretion to dismiss when all claims are subject to arbitration. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 City of Grants Pass, Oregon v. Johnson, No. 23-175 [Arg: 4.22.2024] 2:25:58
2:25:58
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai2:25:58data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the enforcement of generally applicable laws regulating camping on public property constitutes “cruel and unusual punishment” prohibited by the Eighth Amendment. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Thornell v. Jones, No. 22-982 [Arg: 4.17.2024] 1:04:36
1:04:36
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:04:36data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit violated this court’s precedents by employing a flawed methodology for assessing prejudice under Strickland v. Washington when it disregarded the district court’s factual and credibility findings and excluded evidence in aggravation and the state’s rebuttal when it reversed the district court and granted habeas relief. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Fischer v. U.S., No. 23-5572 [Arg: 4.16.2024] 1:40:36
1:40:36
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:40:36data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit erred in construing 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c), which prohibits obstruction of congressional inquiries and investigations, to include acts unrelated to investigations and evidence. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Chiaverini v. City of Napoleon, Ohio, No. 23-50 [Arg: 4.15.2024] 58:22
58:22
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai58:22data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether Fourth Amendment malicious-prosecution claims are governed by the charge-specific rule, under which a malicious prosecution claim can proceed as to a baseless criminal charge even if other charges brought alongside the baseless charge are supported by probable cause, or by the “any-crime” rule, under which probable cause for even one charge defeats a plaintiff’s malicious-prosecution claims as to every other charge, including those lacking probable cause. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Snyder v. U.S., No. 23-108 [Arg: 4.15.2024] 1:38:39
1:38:39
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:38:39data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether section 18 U.S.C. § 666(a)(1)(B) criminalizes gratuities, i.e., payments in recognition of actions a state or local official has already taken or committed to take, without any quid pro quo agreement to take those actions. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Connelly v. Internal Revenue Service, No. 23-146 [Arg: 3.27.2024] 53:43
53:43
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai53:43data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the proceeds of a life-insurance policy taken out by a closely held corporation on a shareholder in order to facilitate the redemption of the shareholder’s stock should be considered a corporate asset when calculating the value of the shareholder’s shares for purposes of the federal estate tax. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Erlinger v. U.S., No. 23-370 [Arg: 3.27.2024] 1:33:07
1:33:07
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:33:07data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the Constitution requires a jury trial and proof beyond a reasonable doubt to find that a defendant’s prior convictions were “committed on occasions different from one another,” as is necessary to impose an enhanced sentence under the Armed Career Criminal Act. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Food and Drug Administration v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, No. 23-235 [Arg: 3.26.2024] 1:32:59
1:32:59
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:32:59data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether respondents have Article III standing to challenge the Food and Drug Administration’s 2016 and 2021 actions with respect to mifepristone’s approved conditions of use; whether the FDA’s 2016 and 2021 actions were arbitrary and capricious; and whether the district court properly granted preliminary relief. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Harrow v. Department of Defense, No. 23-21 [Arg: 3.25.2024] 50:40
50:40
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai50:40data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the 60-day deadline in 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(1)(A) for a federal employee to petition the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit to review a final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board is jurisdictional. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Becerra v. San Carlos Apache Tribe, No. 23-250 [Arg: 3.25.2024] 1:26:29
1:26:29
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:26:29data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the Indian Health Service must pay “contract support costs” not only to support IHS-funded activities, but also to support the tribe’s expenditure of income collected from third parties. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Texas v. New Mexico and Colorado, No. 22O141 [Arg: 3.20.2024] 1:08:41
1:08:41
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:08:41data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the court should deny the motion by Texas, New Mexico, and Colorado for entry of a proposed consent decree that would resolve this dispute over the United States' claim as intervenors that New Mexico violated the Rio Grande Compact without the United States’ consent. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Gonzalez v. Trevino, No. 22-1025 [Arg: 3.20.2024] 1:25:45
1:25:45
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:25:45data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: (1) Whether the probable-cause exception in Nieves v. Barlett can be satisfied by objective evidence other than specific examples of arrests that never happened; and (2) whether Nieves is limited to individual claims against arresting officers for split-second arrests. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Truck Insurance Exchange v. Kaiser Gypsum Company, No. 22-1079 [Arg: 3.19.2024] 1:12:12
1:12:12
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:12:12data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether an insurer with financial responsibility for a bankruptcy claim is a “party in interest” that may object to a plan of reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Diaz v. U.S., No. 23-14 [Arg: 3.19.2024] 1:24:56
1:24:56
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:24:56data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether in a prosecution for drug trafficking — where an element of the offense is that the defendant knew she was carrying illegal drugs — Federal Rule of Evidence 704(b) permits a governmental expert witness to testify that most couriers know they are carrying drugs and that drug-trafficking organizations do not entrust large quantities of drugs to unknowing transporters. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 National Rifle Association of America v. Vullo, No. 22-842 [Arg: 3.18.2024] 1:14:26
1:14:26
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:14:26data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the First Amendment allows a government regulator to threaten regulated entities with adverse regulatory actions if they do business with a controversial speaker, as a consequence of (a) the government’s own hostility to the speaker’s viewpoint or (b) a perceived “general backlash” against the speaker’s advocacy. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Murthy v. Missouri, No. 23-411 [Arg: 3.18.2024] 1:42:32
1:42:32
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:42:32data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: (1) Whether respondents have Article III standing; (2) whether the government’s challenged conduct transformed private social media companies’ content-moderation decisions into state action and violated respondents’ First Amendment rights; and (3) whether the terms and breadth of the preliminary injunction are proper. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Coinbase v. Suski, No. 23-3 [Arg: 2.28.2024] 42:57
42:57
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai42:57data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether, where parties enter into an arbitration agreement with a delegation clause, an arbitrator or a court should decide whether that arbitration agreement is narrowed by a later contract that is silent as to arbitration and delegation. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Garland v. Cargill, No. 22-976 [Arg: 2.28.2024] 1:30:26
1:30:26
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:30:26data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether a bump stock device is a “machinegun” as defined in 26 U.S.C. § 5845(b) because it is designed and intended for use in converting a rifle into a machinegun, i.e., into a weapon that fires “automatically more than one shot ... by a single function of the trigger.” ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Cantero v. Bank of America, No. 22-529 [Arg: 2.27.2024] 1:47:46
1:47:46
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:47:46data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the National Bank Act preempts the application of state escrow-interest laws to national banks. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 McIntosh v. U.S., No. 22-7386 [Arg: 2.27.2024] 48:57
48:57
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai48:57data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether a district court may enter a criminal-forfeiture order outside the time limitations set forth in Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.2. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 NetChoice, LLC v. Paxton, No. 22-555 [Arg: 2.26.2024] 1:20:06
1:20:06
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:20:06data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the First Amendment prohibits viewpoint-, content-, or speaker-based laws restricting select websites from engaging in editorial choices about whether, and how, to publish and disseminate speech ‚Äî or otherwise burdening those editorial choices through onerous operational and disclosure requirements. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Moody v. NetChoice, LLC, No. 22-277 [Arg: 2.26.2024] 2:22:31
2:22:31
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai2:22:31data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: (1) Whether the laws content-moderation restrictions comply with the First Amendment; and (2) whether the laws‚Äô individualized-explanation requirements comply with the First Amendment. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Warner Chappell Music v. Nealy, No. 22-1078 [Arg: 2.21.2024] 53:20
53:20
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai53:20data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether, under the discovery accrual rule applied by the circuit courts and the Copyright Act‚Äôs statute of limitations for civil actions, 17 U.S.C. ¬ß 507(b), a copyright plaintiff can recover damages for acts that allegedly occurred more than three years before the filing of a lawsuit. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Ohio v. Environmental Protection Agency, No. 23A349 [Arg: 2.21.2024] 1:29:06
1:29:06
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:29:06data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: (1) Whether the court should stay the Environmental Protection Agency‚Äôs federal emission reductions rule, the Good Neighbor Plan; and (2) whether the emissions controls imposed by the rule are reasonable regardless of the number of states subject to the rule. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Bissonnette v. LePage Bakeries Park St., LLC, No. 23-51 [Arg: 2.20.2024] 1:00:19
1:00:19
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:00:19data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether, to be exempt from the Federal Arbitration Act, a class of workers that is actively engaged in interstate transportation must also be employed by a company in the transportation industry. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Trump v. Anderson, No. 23-719 [Arg: 2.8.2024] 2:09:05
2:09:05
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai2:09:05data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the Colorado Supreme Court erred in ordering former President Donald Trump excluded from the 2024 presidential primary ballot. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Relentless v. Department of Commerce, No. 22-1219 [Arg: 1.17.2024] 2:11:44
2:11:44
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai2:11:44data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
Issue(s): Whether the court should overrule Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, or at least clarify that statutory silence concerning controversial powers expressly but narrowly granted elsewhere in the statute does not constitute an ambiguity requiring deference to the agency. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, No. 22-451 [Arg: 1.17.2024] 1:16:13
1:16:13
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:16:13data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
Issue(s): Whether the court should overrule Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, or at least clarify that statutory silence concerning controversial powers expressly but narrowly granted elsewhere in the statute does not constitute an ambiguity requiring deference to the agency. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Macquarie Infrastructure Corp. v. Moab Partners, L.P., No. 22-1165 [Arg: 1.16.2024] 1:05:53
1:05:53
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:05:53data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
Issue(s): Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit erred in holding that a failure to make a disclosure required under Item 303 of SEC Regulation S-K can support a private claim under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, even in the absence of an otherwise misleading statement. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Devillier v. Texas, No. 22-913 [Arg: 1.16.2024] 1:11:56
1:11:56
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:11:56data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
Issue(s): Whether a person whose property is taken without compensation may seek redress under the self-executing takings clause of the Fifth Amendment even if the legislature has not affirmatively provided them with a cause of action. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Smith v. Arizona, No. 22-899 [Arg: 1.10.2024] 1:28:54
1:28:54
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:28:54data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
Issue(s): Whether the confrontation clause of the Sixth Amendment permits the prosecution in a criminal trial to present testimony by a substitute expert conveying the testimonial statements of a nontestifying forensic analyst, on the grounds that (a) the testifying expert offers some independent opinion and the analyst’s statements are offered not for their truth but to explain the expert’s opinion, and (b) the defendant did not independently seek to subpoena the analyst. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Office of the U.S. Trustee v. John Q. Hammons Fall 2006, LLC, No. 22-1238 [Arg: 1.9.2024] 1:02:42
1:02:42
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:02:42data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
Issue(s): Whether the appropriate remedy for the constitutional uniformity violation found by this court in Siegel v. Fitzgerald is to require the United States Trustee to grant retrospective refunds of the increased fees paid by debtors in U.S. Trustee districts during the period of disuniformity, or is instead either to deem sufficient the prospective remedy adopted by Congress or to require the collection of additional fees from a much smaller number of debtors in Bankruptcy Administrator districts. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Sheetz v. County of El Dorado, California, No. 22-1074 [Arg: 1.9.2024] 1:28:53
1:28:53
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:28:53data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
Issue(s): Whether a building-permit exaction is exempt from the unconstitutional-conditions doctrine as applied in Nollan v. California Coastal Commission and Dolan v. City of Tigard, Oregon simply because it is authorized by legislation. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Federal Bureau of Investigation v. Fikre, No. 22-1178 [Arg: 1.8.2024] 1:21:49
1:21:49
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:21:49data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
Issue(s): Whether respondent’s claims challenging his placement on the No Fly List are moot given that he was removed from the No Fly List in 2016 and the government provided a sworn declaration stating that he “will not be placed on the No Fly List in the future based on the currently available information. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Campos-Chaves v. Garland, No. 22-674 [Arg: 1.8.2024] 1:28:53
1:28:53
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:28:53data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
Issue(s): Whether the government provides notice “required under” and “in accordance with paragraph (1) or (2) of” 8 U.S.C. § 1229(a) when it serves an initial notice document that does not include the “time and place” of proceedings followed by an additional document containing that information, such that an immigration court must enter a removal order in absentia and deny a noncitizen's request to rescind that order. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Muldrow v. City of St. Louis, Missouri, No. 22-193 [Arg: 12.6.2023] 1:36:42
1:36:42
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:36:42data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Issue(s): Whether Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination in transfer decisions absent a separate court determination that the transfer decision caused a significant disadvantage. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Moore v. U.S., No. 22-800 [Arg: 12.5.2023] 2:04:39
2:04:39
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai2:04:39data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Issue(s): Whether the 16th Amendment authorizes Congress to tax unrealized sums without apportionment among the states. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Harrington v. Purdue Pharma L.P., No. 23-124 [Arg: 12.4.2023] 1:43:35
1:43:35
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:43:35data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Issue(s): Whether the Bankruptcy Code authorizes a court to approve, as part of a plan of reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, a release that extinguishes claims held by nondebtors against nondebtor third parties, without the claimants’ consent. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jarkesy, No. 22-859 [Arg: 11.29.2023] 2:16:41
2:16:41
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai2:16:41data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Issue(s): (1) Whether statutory provisions that empower the Securities and Exchange Commission to initiate and adjudicate administrative enforcement proceedings seeking civil penalties violate the Seventh Amendment; (2) whether statutory provisions that authorize the SEC to choose to enforce the securities laws through an agency adjudication instead of filing a district court action violate the nondelegation doctrine; and (3) whether Congress violated Article II by granting for-cause removal protection to administrative law judges in agencies whose heads enjoy for-cause removal protection. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Wilkinson v. Garland, No. 22-666 [Arg: 11.28.2023] 1:30:23
1:30:23
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:30:23data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Issue(s): Whether an agency determination that a given set of established facts does not rise to the statutory standard of “exceptional and extremely unusual hardship” is a mixed question of law and fact reviewable under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D), or whether this determination is a discretionary judgment call unreviewable under Section 1252(a)(2)(B)(i). ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 McElrath v. Georgia, No. 22-721 [Arg: 11.28.2023] 59:20
59:20
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai59:20data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Issue(s): Whether the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment prohibits a second prosecution for a crime of which a defendant was previously acquitted. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Brown v. U.S., No. 22-6389 [Arg: 11.27.2023] 1:24:50
1:24:50
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:24:50data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Issue(s): Whether the "serious drug offense" definition in the Armed Career Criminal Act incorporates the federal drug schedules that were in effect at the time of the federal firearm offense or the federal drug schedules that were in effect at the time of the prior state drug offense. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Rudisill v. McDonough, No. 22-888 [Arg: 11.8.2023] 1:10:17
1:10:17
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:10:17data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Issue(s): Whether a veteran who has served two separate and distinct periods of qualifying service under the Montgomery GI Bill and the Post-9/11 GI Bill is entitled to receive a total of 48 months of education benefits as between both programs, without first exhausting the Montgomery benefit in order to obtain the more generous Post-9/11 benefit. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 U.S. v. Rahimi, No. 22-915 [Arg: 11.7.2023] 1:32:41
1:32:41
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:32:41data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Issue(s): Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8) , which prohibits the possession of firearms by persons subject to domestic-violence restraining orders, violates the Second Amendment on its face. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Department of Agriculture Rural Development Rural Housing Service v. Kirtz, No. 22-846 [Arg: 11.6.2023] 1:18:29
1:18:29
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:18:29data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Issue(s): Whether the civil-liability provisions of the Fair Credit Reporting Act unequivocally and unambiguously waive the sovereign immunity of the United States. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Vidal v. Elster, No. 22-704 [Arg: 11.1.2023] 1:15:48
1:15:48
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:15:48data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Issue(s): Whether the refusal to register a trademark under 15 U.S.C. § 1052(c) violates the free speech clause of the First Amendment when the mark contains criticism of a government official or public figure. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 O’Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier, No. 22-324 [Arg: 10.31.2023] 1:40:35
1:40:35
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:40:35data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Issue(s): Whether a public official engages in state action subject to the First Amendment by blocking an individual from the official’s personal social media account, when the official uses the account to feature their job and communicate about job-related matters with the public, but does not do so pursuant to any governmental authority or duty. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Lindke v. Freed, No. 22-611 [Arg: 10.31.2023] 1:17:22
1:17:22
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:17:22data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Issue(s): Whether a public official’s social media activity can constitute state action only if the official used the account to perform a governmental duty or under the authority of his or her office. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Culley v. Marshall, No. 22-585 [Arg: 10.30.2023] 1:39:56
1:39:56
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:39:56data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
Question Presented: Issue(s): Whether district courts, in determining whether the due process clause requires a state or local government to provide a post-seizure probable-cause hearing prior to a statutory judicial-forfeiture proceeding and, if so, when such a hearing must take place, should apply the “speedy trial” test employed in United States v. $8,850 and Barker v. Wingo or the three-part due process analysis set forth in Mathews v. Eldridge . ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Alexander v. South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP, No. 22-807 [Arg: 10.11.2023] 2:05:05
2:05:05
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai2:05:05data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: (1) Whether the district court erred when it failed to apply the presumption of good faith and to holistically analyze South Carolina Congressional District 1 and the South Carolina General Assembly’s intent; (2) whether the district court erred in failing to enforce the alternative-map requirement in this circumstantial case; (3) whether the district court erred when it failed to disentangle race from politics; (4) whether the district court erred in finding racial predominance when it never analyzed District 1’s compliance with traditional districting principles; (5) whether the district court clearly erred in finding that the General Assembly used a racial target as a proxy for politics when the record showed only that the General Assembly was aware of race, that race and politics are highly correlated, and that the General Assembly drew districts based on election data; and (6) whether the district court erred in upholding the intentional-discrimination claim when it never even considered whether—let alone found that—District 1 has a discriminatory effect. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e6/689e6a8098c7a60798305c721e1b4fea6ff8f83f" alt="Artwork"
1 Great Lakes Insurance SE v. Raiders Retreat Realty Co., LLC, No. 22-500 [Arg: 10.10.2023] 1:10:54
1:10:54
Putar Nanti
Putar Nanti
Daftar
Suka
Menyukai1:10:54data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether, under federal admiralty law, a choice-of-law clause in a maritime contract can be rendered unenforceable if enforcement is contrary to the “strong public policy” of the state whose law is displaced. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
Selamat datang di Player FM!
Player FM memindai web untuk mencari podcast berkualitas tinggi untuk Anda nikmati saat ini. Ini adalah aplikasi podcast terbaik dan bekerja untuk Android, iPhone, dan web. Daftar untuk menyinkronkan langganan di seluruh perangkat.