Podcast Oyez terbaik (2024)

1
City and County of San Francisco v. Environmental Protection Agency 1:37:34

15d ago1:37:34

1:37:34

A case in which the Court will decide whether the Clean Water Act allows the Environmental Protection Agency (or an authorized state) to impose generic prohibitions in National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permits that subject permit-holders to enforcement for violating water quality standards without identifying specific limits to which …

1
Bufkin v. McDonough 1:12:44

15d ago1:12:44

1:12:44

A case in which the Court will decide whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims must ensure that the benefit-of-the-doubt rule in 38 U.S.C. § 5107(b) was properly applied during the claims process in order to satisfy 38 U.S.C. § 7261(b)(1).

1
Bouarfa v. Mayorkas 49:19

16d ago49:19

49:19

A case in which the Court will decide whether a visa petitioner may obtain judicial review when an approved petition is revoked on the basis of nondiscretionary criteria.

1
Medical Marijuana, Inc. v. Horn 1:08:18

16d ago1:08:18

1:08:18

A case in which the Court will decide whether economic harms resulting from personal injuries are injuries to “business or property by reason of” the defendant’s acts for purposes of a civil treble-damages action under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act.

1
Glossip v. Oklahoma 1:43:02

22d ago1:43:02

1:43:02

A capital case in which the Court will decide whether to allow Oklahoma to execute Petitioner Richard Glossip after numerous instances of prosecutorial misconduct and other errors, where even the state no longer defends the capital sentence.

1
Lackey v. Stinnie 1:17:55

23d ago1:17:55

1:17:55

A case in which the Court will decide whether a party who obtains a preliminary injunction is a “prevailing party” for purposes of being entitled to attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988.

1
Garland v. VanDerStok 1:16:07

23d ago1:16:07

1:16:07

A case in which the Court will decide whether the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives has the authority to regulate so-called “ghost guns”—that is, firearms without serial numbers that can be assembled from parts.

1
Williams v. Washington 1:15:51

24d ago1:15:51

1:15:51

A case in which the Court will decide whether exhaustion of state administrative remedies is required to bring claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in state court.

1
Royal Canin U.S.A. v. Wullschleger 1:05:22

24d ago1:05:22

1:05:22

A case in which the Court will decide whether a plaintiff whose state-court lawsuit has been removed by the defendants to federal court can seek to have the case sent back to state court by amending the complaint to omit all references to federal law.

1
Trump v. United States 2:39:18

6M ago2:39:18

2:39:18

A case in which the Court held that a former U.S. President has absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for actions within his conclusive and preclusive constitutional authority, at least presumptive immunity from prosecution for all his official acts, and no immunity for unofficial acts.

1
Moyle v. United States 1:53:01

6M ago1:53:01

1:53:01

A case in which the Court was asked to decide whether the federal Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act—which requires hospitals receiving Medicare funding to offer “necessary stabilizing treatment” to pregnant women in emergencies—preempts an Idaho law that criminalizes most abortions in the state.…

1
Starbucks Corporation v. McKinney 52:18

6M ago52:18

52:18

A case in which the Court will decide what test courts must use to evaluate the National Labor Relations Board’s requests for injunctions under Section 10(j) of the National Labor Relations Act.

1
Department of State v. Munoz 1:31:25

6M ago1:31:25

1:31:25

A case in which the Court will decide whether the denial of a visa to the non-citizen spouse of a U.S. citizen infringes on a constitutionally protected interest of the citizen and, if so, whether the government properly justified that decision.

1
City of Grants Pass v. Johnson 2:25:57

6M ago2:25:57

2:25:57

A case in which the Court held that the Eighth Amendment’s protection against cruel and unusual punishment does not prevent a city from enforcing a ban on public camping against homeless individuals.

1
Smith v. Spizzirri 43:16

6M ago43:16

43:16

A case in which the Court held that Section 3 of the Federal Arbitration Act requires district courts to stay a lawsuit pending arbitration, and does not give district courts discretion to dismiss the suit when all claims are subject to arbitration.

1
Thornell v. Jones 1:04:36

7M ago1:04:36

1:04:36

A case in which the Court held that when a capital defendant claims that he was prejudiced at sentencing because counsel failed to present available mitigating evidence, a court must decide whether it is reasonably likely that the additional evidence would have avoided a death sentence, which the court does by evaluating the strength of all the evi…

1
Fischer v. United States 1:40:35

7M ago1:40:35

1:40:35

A case in which the Court held that 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c), which prohibits obstruction of congressional inquiries and investigations, does not include acts unrelated to investigations and evidence.

1
Snyder v. United States 1:38:39

7M ago1:38:39

1:38:39

A case in which the Court held that 8 U.S.C. § 666(a)(1)(B) does not criminalize gratuities, i.e., payments in recognition of actions a state or local official has already taken or committed to take.

1
Chiaverini v. City of Napoleon, Ohio 58:21

7M ago58:21

58:21

A case in which the Court held that a Fourth Amendment malicious-prosecution claim can proceed as to a baseless criminal charge so long as other charges brought alongside the baseless charge are supported by probable cause.

1
Erlinger v. United States 1:33:07

7M ago1:33:07

1:33:07

A case in which the Court held that the Constitution requires a jury trial and proof beyond a reasonable doubt to find that a defendant’s prior convictions were “committed on occasions different from one another,” as is necessary to impose an enhanced sentence under the Armed Career Criminal Act.

1
Connelly v. United States 53:43

7M ago53:43

53:43

A case in which the Court held that a corporation’s contractual obligation to redeem shares is not necessarily a liability that reduces a corporation’s value for purposes of the federal estate tax.

1
Food and Drug Administration v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine 1:32:58

7M ago1:32:58

1:32:58

A case in which the Court was asked to resolve a challenge to the Food and Drug Administration’s 2016 and 2021 approval of the abortion drug mifepristone.

1
Harrow v. Department of Defense 50:40

7M ago50:40

50:40

A case in which the Court held that the 60-day filing deadline in 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(1)(A) is not jurisdictional.

1
Becerra v. San Carlos Apache Tribe 1:26:28

7M ago1:26:28

1:26:28

A case in which the Court held that the Indian Health Service must pay “contract support costs” not only to support IHS-funded activities, but also to support the tribe’s expenditure of income collected from third parties.

1
Texas v. New Mexico and Colorado 1:08:40

7M ago1:08:40

1:08:40

A case in which the Court will decide whether to approve a consent decree resolving claims among Colorado, Texas, and New Mexico over the delivery of water from the Rio Grande Basin to Elephant Butte.

1
Gonzalez v. Trevino 1:25:44

7M ago1:25:44

1:25:44

A case in which the Court will decide whether the probable-cause exception in Nieves v. Barlett can be satisfied by objective evidence other than specific examples of arrests that never happened; and whether Nieves is limited to individual claims against arresting officers for split-second arrests.

1
Truck Insurance Exchange v. Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc. 1:12:11

8M ago1:12:11

1:12:11

A case in which the Court held that an insurer with financial responsibility for a bankruptcy claim is a “party in interest” that may object to a plan of reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code.

1
Diaz v. United States 1:24:55

8M ago1:24:55

1:24:55

A case in which the Court held that in a prosecution for drug trafficking—where an element of the offense is that the defendant knew she was carrying illegal drugs—Federal Rule of Evidence 704(b) permits a governmental expert witness to testify that most couriers know they are carrying drugs and that drug-trafficking organizations do not entrust la…

1
National Rifle Association of America v. Vullo 1:14:26

8M ago1:14:26

1:14:26

A case in which the Court permitted the National Rifle Association's lawsuit to proceed where it plausibly alleged that the New York State Department of Financial Services (DFS) violated the First Amendment by coercing regulated entities to terminate their business relationships with the NRA in order to punish or suppress the NRA’s gun-promotion ad…

1
Murthy v. Missouri 1:42:31

8M ago1:42:31

1:42:31

A case in which the Court was asked to decide whether the government’s requests to large social media companies that they take steps to prevent the dissemination of purported misinformation constituted coercion and thus transformed those private companies’ content-moderation decisions into state action and violated users’ First Amendment rights.…

1
Coinbase, Inc. v. Suski 42:56

8M ago42:56

42:56

A case in which the Court held that, when parties enter into an arbitration agreement with a delegation clause, a court must decide whether that arbitration agreement is narrowed by a later contract that is silent as to arbitration and delegation.

1
Garland v. Cargill 1:30:25

8M ago1:30:25

1:30:25

A case in which the Court held that a bump stock device is not a “machinegun” as defined in 26 U.S.C. § 5845(b).

1
McIntosh v. United States 48:57

8M ago48:57

48:57

A case in which the Court held that, because the relevant rules a time-related directive, a district court can enter a criminal forfeiture order when the time limit specified in the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure has already passed.

1
Cantero v. Bank of America, N.A. 1:47:46

8M ago1:47:46

1:47:46

A case in which the Court clarified the test for whether the National Bank Act preempts the application of state laws to national banks.

1
NetChoice, LLC v. Paxton 1:20:05

8M ago1:20:05

1:20:05

A case in which the Court was asked to decide whether a state law restricting social media platforms from engaging in editorial choices about whether, and how, to publish and disseminate speech and requiring them to submit to onerous operational and disclosure requirements violates the First Amendment.…

1
Moody v. NetChoice, LLC 2:22:31

8M ago2:22:31

2:22:31

A case in which the Court was asked to decide whether Florida S.B. 7072’s content-moderation restrictions comply with the First Amendment and whether the law’s individualized-explanation requirements comply with the First Amendment.

1
Warner Chappell Music, Inc. v. Nealy 53:19

8M ago53:19

53:19

A case in which the Court held that the Copyright Act entitles a copyright owner to obtain monetary relief for any timely infringement claim, no matter when the infringement occurred.

1
Ohio v. Environmental Protection Agency 1:29:05

8M ago1:29:05

1:29:05

A case in which the Court stayed the Environmental Protection Agency’s federal emission reductions rule, the Good Neighbor Plan, for failure to adequately explain its emissions reduction requirements, likely violating the Administrative Procedure Act.

1
Bissonnette v. LePage Bakeries Park St., LLC 1:00:18

8M ago1:00:18

1:00:18

A case in which the Court held that a worker need not be employed by a company in the transportation industry to be exempt from the Federal Arbitration Act.

1
Corner Post, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System 1:10:13

8M ago1:10:13

1:10:13

A case in which the Court held that a plaintiff’s Administrative Procedure Act claim “first accrues” under 28 U.S.C. § 2401(a) when an agency's rule first causes harm to the plaintiff.

1
Trump v. Anderson 2:09:05

9M ago2:09:05

2:09:05

A case in which the Court held that Congress alone must decide whether Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment disqualifies an individual from running for the office of President.

1
Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo 1:16:13

10M ago1:16:13

1:16:13

A case in which the Court overruled its decision in Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council.

1
Relentless, Inc. v. Department of Commerce 2:11:44

10M ago2:11:44

2:11:44

A case in which the Court overruled Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council.

1
Devillier v. Texas 1:11:55

10M ago1:11:55

1:11:55

A case in which the Court was asked to decide whether a person whose property is taken without compensation may seek redress directly under the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment even if the legislature has not affirmatively provided them with a cause of action, but it concluded that it did not need to resolve that question to dispose of this ca…

1
Macquarie Infrastructure Corp. v. Moab Partners, L.P. 1:05:53

10M ago1:05:53

1:05:53

A case in which the Court held that a failure to make a disclosure required under Item 303 of SEC Regulation S-K cannot support a private claim under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in the absence of an otherwise misleading statement.

1
Smith v. Arizona 1:28:53

10M ago1:28:53

1:28:53

A case in which the Court held that the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment is triggered when the prosecution in a criminal trial seeks to present testimony by a substitute expert conveying the testimonial statements of a nontestifying forensic analyst.

1
Office of the United States Trustee v. John Q. Hammons Fall 2006, LLC 1:02:41

10M ago1:02:41

1:02:41

A case in which the Court held that the U.S. Trustee was not required to issue refunds for the extra fees paid by debtors in certain districts to address the lack of uniformity identified in Siegel v. Fitzgerald; prospective parity is the appropriate remedy.

1
Sheetz v. County of El Dorado, California 1:28:53

10M ago1:28:53

1:28:53

A case in which the Court held that the Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause does not distinguish between legislative and administrative land-use permit conditions.

1
Campos-Chaves v. Garland 1:40:16

10M ago1:40:16

1:40:16

A case in which the Court held that the government provides adequate notice under 8 U.S.C. § 1229(a) when it serves an initial notice document lacking the “time and place” of proceedings followed by an additional document containing that information.

1
Federal Bureau of Investigation v. Fikre 1:21:48

10M ago1:21:48

1:21:48

A case in which the Court held that respondent’s claims challenging his placement on the No Fly List are not moot because the government's declaration stating that he “will not be placed on the No Fly List in the future based on the currently available information” did not ensure that he would not be placed back on the list for engaging in the same…

Podcast Layak Disimak

Oyez Podcast

Podcast Layak Disimak

Panduan Referensi Cepat